San Diego State
- SP+
- −4.4 (#84)
- FPI
- −5.4 (#88)
- SRS
- −6.9 (#99)
- Resume
- #68
Next game
Advanced stats
CollegeFootballData's play-by-play measures of how efficient and explosive a team was, placed against every other FBS team. How it works →
Profile vs. FBS, 2022
Farther out is better on every spoke. Dashed ring: the FBS median.
- EPA per playExpected points added on an average snap: how much each play moved the scoring odds.
- Success rateShare of snaps that stayed on schedule: half the yards needed on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of them on 3rd or 4th.
- ExplosivenessAverage EPA on the successful snaps: how big the good plays were.
- Rushing EPAEPA per designed run.
- Passing EPAEPA per pass play.
- Standard downsSuccess rate on downs where either a run or a pass makes sense, like 1st and 10 or 3rd and 2.
- Passing downsSuccess rate on downs that all but force a pass, like 2nd and 8 or longer, or 3rd and 5 or longer.
- Line yardsRushing yards per carry credited to the offensive line, weighting the first few yards most.
- Stuff rateShare of runs stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage.
- HavocShare of snaps with a tackle for loss, sack, forced fumble, interception or pass breakup.
Percentiles among the 131 FBS teams this season, where higher is better for the offense and the defense alike (a defense's numbers are what it allowed). The line in each bar is the FBS median. Garbage time excluded. Source: CollegeFootballData.
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2022
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what San Diego State allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season. Ranks are among FBS teams.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for San Diego State.
Players
YardLine's player model credits every play's value to the players involved, so each one's season can be measured in wins above a typical backup. How it works →
Players, 2022
Quarterback is the most valuable starting slot by a wide margin: the gap between a top-decile and a median FBS quarterback is about twice the gap at any other position.
- Jalen MaydenQB290 plays · +0.276 pts/play · 45th of 234 QBs1.50WAR0.83 to 2.20
- Braxton BurmeisterQB67 plays · +0.139 pts/play · 183rd of 234 QBs0.17WAR0.04 to 0.32
- Tyrell ShaversWR47 plays · +0.175 pts/play · 108th of 455 WRs0.15WAR0.08 to 0.23
- Jesse MatthewsWR49 plays · +0.161 pts/play · 116th of 455 WRs0.15WAR0.07 to 0.23
- Jack BrowningPK66 plays · +0.107 pts/play · 8th of 110 kickers0.13WAR0.06 to 0.22
- Kenan Christon IIRB60 plays · +0.104 pts/play · 235th of 384 RBs0.12WAR0.07 to 0.16
- Mekhi ShawWR31 plays · +0.192 pts/play · 191st of 455 WRs0.11WAR0.07 to 0.16
- Jordan ByrdRB88 plays · +0.052 pts/play · 272nd of 384 RBs0.09WAR0.00 to 0.17
Every player (10)
- Mark RedmanTE26 plays · +0.149 pts/play · 63rd of 214 TEs0.07WAR0.03 to 0.11
- Chance BellRB42 plays · +0.090 pts/play · 279th of 384 RBs0.07WAR0.03 to 0.11
By position group, against FBS
Linemen and defenders are valued as units, in points per game against the median FBS unit, because play-by-play doesn't say who was on the field. Players are valued against a replacement-level backup, so the two aren't added together.
Wins above replacement credits each play's expected points to the players involved, adjusted for the opponent, and compares San Diego State's players with a typical backup; 53 points make a win. Only snaps while the game was in doubt count, so a starter on a team that blows opponents out plays fewer of them: read value per play beside WAR. The line under each player (or the range on a phone) is the 90% interval. Ranks are among FBS teams and players. How this works
Transfer portal, 2022
6 players transferred in and 9 out. WAR is each one's 2021 season, before the move. Every team's portal
In 2022, the arrivals have added 0.36 WAR at San Diego State and the departures 0.00 wherever they went.
- Braxton BurmeisterQB · 3★from Virginia Tech1.180.17
- Kenan ChristonRB · 3★from USC-0.12
- Mark RedmanTE · 3★from Washington-0.07
The other 3
- Cade BennettOT · 3★from Oklahoma State--
- Cooper McDonaldLB · 3★from Washington--
- Justus TavaiDL · 3★from Hawai'i--
- Lucas JohnsonQB · 3★to Montana0.78-
- Jordon BrookshireQB · 3★to undecided0.45-
- Kaegun WilliamsRB · 3★to Montana State0.11-
The other 6
- Chris MartinezOT · 3★to Arizona State--
- Ilaisa GonebureDL · 3★to undecided--
- Joey CapraIOL · 3★to Nevada--
- Rashad ScottWR · 3★to undecided--
- Allan MwataS · 2★to undecided--
- Hunter KaupikoLB · 2★to Nevada--
Only quarterbacks, skill players and specialists have a WAR of their own, so they make up these totals; linemen and defenders count in the moves but add none. 2021 is the player's season at his old school, 2022 his season after the move. A dash means no FBS snaps that season. Rosters tie CFBD's portal entries to players, which works for about 19 in 20 skill-position moves.
Talent and roster
How much talent the roster had, by recruiting ratings, and how much of it showed up on the field, against every other FBS team. How it works →
What it had and what it did, 2022
- Roster talent: 372, 114th of 129 in FBSRoster talent247Sports' talent composite: the recruiting ratings of every player on the roster, transfers included.
- Recruiting: 158, 73rd of 129 in FBSRecruitingAverage 247Sports class score over this season's class and the three before it.
- Returning production: 34%, 101st of 128 in FBSReturning productionShare of last season's production (expected points added) by players still on the roster.
- SP+ rating: −4.4, 83rd of 129 in FBSSP+ ratingThe result: Bill Connelly's opponent-adjusted rating, points per game better than an average FBS team.
Ranks and bars among the 129 FBS teams with a talent rating this season, best first; the line in each bar is the FBS median.
Talent conversion
San Diego State's SP+ of −4.4 is 3.9 points above the −8.3 its roster talent predicts, 51st of 129 in FBS.
The same comparison on each side of the ball, positive is better for both.
Conversion by season
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2022
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than San Diego State's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 6 clear-cut ones account for 0.15 of the 0.23 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right. Ranks are among FBS teams; 1st gave up the least.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- vs TOLQ4 6:09 4th & 2 at SDSU 49, up 3Punted; the numbers favored going for it−3.6 pts
- at NEVQ4 5:54 4th & 1 at SDSU 36, down 1Punted; the numbers favored going for it−3.5 pts
- vs UNLVQ4 12:41 4th & 9 at SDSU 21, up 7Went for it; the numbers favored punting−3.3 pts
- at NEVQ3 9:01 4th & 2 at NEV 6, down 1Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it−1.9 pts
- at BOISQ4 13:10 4th & 3 at BOIS 47, down 8Punted; the numbers favored going for it−1.8 pts
- vs ARIZQ4 9:51 4th & 14 at ARIZ 27, down 18Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal−1.4 pts
- vs TOLQ4 13:00 4th & 3 at SDSU 48, up 10Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.9 pts
- vs MTSUQ2 7:23 4th & 2 at MTSU 26, up 11Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.7 pts
Every call this season (113)
- Q1 12:414th & 4 at SDSU 27, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q1 6:184th & 7 at SDSU 28, down 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 13:314th & 13 at ARIZ 27, down 10 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 9:124th & 10 at SDSU 35, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 4:494th & 3 at ARIZ 11, down 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 8:494th & 5 at ARIZ 44, down 21 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 3:364th & 6 at ARIZ 6, down 14 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 12:074th & 5 at SDSU 30, down 18 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 12:074th & 5 at SDSU 30, down 18 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 9:514th & 14 at ARIZ 27, down 18 · Went for it−1.4 pts
- Q1 13:584th & 10 at SDSU 41, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 7:504th & 17 at SDSU 49, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 0:004th & 4 at SDSU 31, up 7 · Went for itClose call
- Q2 7:434th & 2 at SDSU 38, up 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 6:184th & 1 at IDST 42, up 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 2:114th & 8 at IDST 39, up 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 2:114th & 8 at IDST 39, up 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 0:374th & 8 at IDST 44, up 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 2:324th & 2 at IDST 2, up 14 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q3 0:234th & 1 at SDSU 41, up 17 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 9:334th & 8 at SDSU 10, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 5:434th & 1 at SDSU 48, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q1 0:424th & 4 at SDSU 47, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q2 11:244th & 7 at SDSU 38, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 6:414th & 2 at SDSU 48, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 9:264th & 11 at SDSU 24, down 28 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 3:034th & 11 at SDSU 38, down 35 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 12:204th & 5 at UTAH 26, down 35 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 12:114th & 5 at UTAH 26, down 35 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 8:114th & 5 at SDSU 31, down 35 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 6:504th & 6 at UTAH 21, down 35 · Went for itClose call
- Q1 13:124th & 5 at SDSU 30, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 10:014th & 20 at SDSU 18, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 4:354th & 6 at SDSU 36, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 9:274th & 9 at TOL 37, up 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 1:564th & 8 at SDSU 36, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 10:544th & 17 at TOL 47, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 4:044th & 16 at TOL 46, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 0:124th & 10 at TOL 33, up 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 13:004th & 3 at SDSU 48, up 10 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 6:094th & 2 at SDSU 49, up 3 · Punted−3.6 pts
- Q1 9:534th & 1 at BOIS 20, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 7:264th & 4 at BOIS 4, tied · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q1 1:544th & 8 at BOIS 8, up 3 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 6:064th & 10 at SDSU 8, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 2:004th & 9 at SDSU 21, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 13:104th & 3 at BOIS 47, down 8 · Punted−1.8 pts
- Q4 8:324th & 8 at SDSU 24, down 15 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 4:164th & 10 at SDSU 28, down 22 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 1:004th & 9 at SDSU 37, down 22 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 7:014th & 2 at SDSU 28, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q1 1:154th & 10 at SDSU 12, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 15:004th & 1 at SDSU 29, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 10:474th & 4 at HAW 43, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q2 2:104th & 13 at SDSU 32, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:394th & 10 at HAW 28, tied · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 4:204th & 21 at SDSU 44, up 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 11:164th & 8 at HAW 13, up 3 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 4:574th & 11 at HAW 14, up 6 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 9:044th & 4 at NEV 13, up 7 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q1 2:444th & 24 at NEV 40, up 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 7:484th & 9 at NEV 9, up 10 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 0:054th & 11 at SDSU 42, down 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:054th & 11 at SDSU 42, down 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 13:294th & 15 at SDSU 18, down 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 9:014th & 2 at NEV 6, down 1 · Kicked a field goal−1.9 pts
- Q4 12:214th & 17 at SDSU 43, down 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 5:544th & 1 at SDSU 36, down 1 · Punted−3.5 pts
- Q1 8:494th & 1 at SDSU 11, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q1 4:024th & 14 at SDSU 48, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 5:324th & 7 at UNLV 34, up 7 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q2 2:564th & 10 at SDSU 21, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:334th & 9 at UNLV 49, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 5:514th & 11 at SDSU 19, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 3:304th & 1 at UNLV 41, up 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 2:154th & 7 at UNLV 31, up 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 12:414th & 9 at SDSU 21, up 7 · Went for it−3.3 pts
- Q4 8:324th & 14 at SDSU 42, up 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 3:354th & 2 at SDSU 41, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q2 5:084th & 1 at UNM 30, up 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 12:084th & 1 at UNM 49, up 11 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 3:504th & 7 at UNM 13, up 18 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 8:214th & 9 at UNM 29, up 21 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 4:054th & 4 at SDSU 37, up 24 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 8:544th & 7 at AF 28, down 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 0:364th & 5 at SDSU 10, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 5:244th & 3 at SDSU 25, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 1:254th & 15 at SDSU 16, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 9:124th & 7 at AF 9, down 10 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 6:454th & 20 at SDSU 17, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 0:434th & 10 at SDSU 27, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 8:024th & 6 at SDSU 42, down 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 2:314th & 4 at SDSU 35, down 10 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 12:074th & 1 at SDSU 18, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q1 9:204th & 7 at SDSU 32, tied · Went for itClose call
- Q1 0:404th & 1 at SDSU 36, up 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 12:524th & 14 at SDSU 36, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 7:234th & 2 at MTSU 26, up 11 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q2 2:124th & 20 at SDSU 8, up 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:414th & 1 at SDSU 41, up 4 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 13:274th & 2 at SDSU 33, up 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 1:264th & 15 at MTSU 22, down 2 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 10:154th & 10 at MTSU 19, down 5 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 5:434th & 5 at MTSU 35, down 2 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Costliest tries against the numbers
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2022
66th of 131 FBS teams at beating the model's pregame expectations
Expected wins adds up San Diego State's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2022
Every game starts at San Diego State's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard−0.48
- Possession & field position−0.04
- Clock−0.09
- Timeouts+0.10
- Other+0.01
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff−0.08
Game by game
- ARIZL 20-38 vs ARIZ60% → 2%Before kickoff +10 · On the field −58: Scoreboard −57, Clock −2
- IDSTW 38-7 vs IDST97% → 100%Before kickoff +47 · On the field +3: Scoreboard +5
- UTAHL 7-35 at UTAH5% → 0%Before kickoff −45 · On the field −5: Scoreboard −8
- TOLW 17-14 vs TOL40% → 96%Before kickoff −10 · On the field +56: Scoreboard +38, Timeouts +2
- BOISL 13-35 at BOIS28% → 0%Before kickoff −22 · On the field −28: Scoreboard −32
- HAWW 16-14 vs HAW94% → 87%Before kickoff +44 · On the field −7: Scoreboard +10, Timeouts +1
- NEVW 23-7 at NEV71% → 17%Before kickoff +21 · On the field −54: Scoreboard −17, Possession & field position −3
- FRESL 28-32 at FRES19% → 23%Before kickoff −31 · On the field +5: Scoreboard −11, Possession & field position −1
- UNLVW 14-10 vs UNLV63% → 97%Before kickoff +13 · On the field +34: Scoreboard +31, Timeouts +2
- SJSUW 43-27 vs SJSU41% → 99%Before kickoff −9 · On the field +59: Scoreboard +48, Timeouts +2
- UNMW 34-10 at UNM83% → 100%Before kickoff +33 · On the field +16: Scoreboard +24, Clock +1
- AFL 3-13 vs AF41% → 4%Before kickoff −9 · On the field −36: Scoreboard −47, Clock −3
- MTSUL 23-25 vs MTSU67% → 25%Before kickoff +17 · On the field −42: Scoreboard −32, Clock −4
Points of win probability, from San Diego State's side.
Closest call
TOL 14-17 SDSU (2022) - San Diego State dropped to a 13.4% win probability before pulling it out.
Season arc, 2022
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is San Diego State's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2022
The largest single-play change in San Diego State's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
San Diego State's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
San Diego State's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
San Diego State's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
San Diego State's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.