San Diego State
- SP+
- +11.4 (#31)
- FPI
- +7.5 (#45)
- SRS
- +5.4 (#44)
- Final AP
- #25
- Resume
- #42
Next game
Advanced stats
CollegeFootballData's play-by-play measures of how efficient and explosive a team was, placed against every other FBS team. How it works →
Profile vs. FBS, 2016
Farther out is better on every spoke. Dashed ring: the FBS median.
- EPA per playExpected points added on an average snap: how much each play moved the scoring odds.
- Success rateShare of snaps that stayed on schedule: half the yards needed on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of them on 3rd or 4th.
- ExplosivenessAverage EPA on the successful snaps: how big the good plays were.
- Rushing EPAEPA per designed run.
- Passing EPAEPA per pass play.
- Standard downsSuccess rate on downs where either a run or a pass makes sense, like 1st and 10 or 3rd and 2.
- Passing downsSuccess rate on downs that all but force a pass, like 2nd and 8 or longer, or 3rd and 5 or longer.
- Line yardsRushing yards per carry credited to the offensive line, weighting the first few yards most.
- Stuff rateShare of runs stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage.
- HavocShare of snaps with a tackle for loss, sack, forced fumble, interception or pass breakup.
Percentiles among the 128 FBS teams this season, where higher is better for the offense and the defense alike (a defense's numbers are what it allowed). The line in each bar is the FBS median. Garbage time excluded. Source: CollegeFootballData.
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2016
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what San Diego State allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season. Ranks are among FBS teams.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for San Diego State.
Players
YardLine's player model credits every play's value to the players involved, so each one's season can be measured in wins above a typical backup. How it works →
Players, 2016
Quarterback is the most valuable starting slot by a wide margin: the gap between a top-decile and a median FBS quarterback is about twice the gap at any other position.
- Donnel PumphreyRB316 plays · +0.182 pts/play · 2nd of 347 RBs1.08WAR0.72 to 1.38
- Christian ChapmanQB258 plays · +0.190 pts/play · 91st of 218 QBs0.92WAR0.49 to 1.34
- Rashaad PennyRB108 plays · +0.203 pts/play · 79th of 347 RBs0.41WAR0.27 to 0.54
- Tanner BlainP43 plays · +0.240 pts/play · 22nd of 82 punters0.19WAR0.12 to 0.29
- John Baron IIPK18 plays · +0.491 pts/play · 17th of 116 kickers0.17WAR0.12 to 0.21
- Mikah HolderWR35 plays · +0.188 pts/play · 169th of 417 WRs0.12WAR0.07 to 0.17
- David WellsTE26 plays · +0.066 pts/play · 29th of 195 TEs0.03WAR−0.01 to 0.07
- Eric JudgeWR17 plays · +0.099 pts/play · 374th of 417 WRs0.03WAR0.02 to 0.05
Every player (9)
- Nick BawdenFB17 plays · +0.028 pts/play · 290th of 347 RBs0.01WAR−0.01 to 0.03
By position group, against FBS
Linemen and defenders are valued as units, in points per game against the median FBS unit, because play-by-play doesn't say who was on the field. Players are valued against a replacement-level backup, so the two aren't added together.
Wins above replacement credits each play's expected points to the players involved, adjusted for the opponent, and compares San Diego State's players with a typical backup; 53 points make a win. Only snaps while the game was in doubt count, so a starter on a team that blows opponents out plays fewer of them: read value per play beside WAR. The line under each player (or the range on a phone) is the 90% interval. Ranks are among FBS teams and players. How this works
Talent and roster
How much talent the roster had, by recruiting ratings, and how much of it showed up on the field, against every other FBS team. How it works →
What it had and what it did, 2016
- Roster talent: 482, 74th of 128 in FBSRoster talent247Sports' talent composite: the recruiting ratings of every player on the roster, transfers included.
- Recruiting: 151, 75th of 128 in FBSRecruitingAverage 247Sports class score over this season's class and the three before it.
- Returning production: 57%, 85th of 128 in FBSReturning productionShare of last season's production (expected points added) by players still on the roster.
- SP+ rating: +11.4, 31st of 128 in FBSSP+ ratingThe result: Bill Connelly's opponent-adjusted rating, points per game better than an average FBS team.
Ranks and bars among the 128 FBS teams with a talent rating this season, best first; the line in each bar is the FBS median.
Talent conversion
San Diego State's SP+ of +11.4 is 14.4 points above the −3.0 its roster talent predicts, 10th of 128 in FBS.
The same comparison on each side of the ball, positive is better for both.
Conversion by season
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2016
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than San Diego State's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 5 clear-cut ones account for 0.08 of the 0.14 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right. Ranks are among FBS teams; 1st gave up the least.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- at WYOQ4 6:54 4th & 2 at WYO 3, up 7Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it−2.4 pts
- vs HOUQ3 10:46 4th & 2 at HOU 46, down 4Punted; the numbers favored going for it−1.9 pts
- at WYOQ2 6:26 4th & 1 at SDSU 40, up 7Punted; the numbers favored going for it−1.7 pts
- vs CSUQ2 4:59 4th & 1 at SDSU 40, down 11Punted; the numbers favored going for it−1.5 pts
- at NIUQ4 4:16 4th & 4 at NIU 38, up 14Punted; the numbers favored going for it−1.0 pts
- at NIUQ2 3:52 4th & 1 at SDSU 47, up 21Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.9 pts
- vs HAWQ3 13:29 4th & 22 at HAW 34, up 27Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.7 pts
- vs UNLVQ4 9:55 4th & 1 at UNLV 47, up 19Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.6 pts
Every call this season (86)
- Q1 10:454th & 4 at CAL 32, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 8:194th & 12 at SDSU 35, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 6:424th & 11 at CAL 41, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:384th & 2 at CAL 22, up 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 15:004th & 5 at SDSU 40, up 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 7:524th & 6 at SDSU 29, up 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 10:554th & 27 at SDSU 34, up 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 14:094th & 2 at NIU 5, up 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 9:374th & 20 at NIU 48, up 21 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 3:524th & 1 at SDSU 47, up 21 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 15:004th & 21 at SDSU 14, up 21 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 10:544th & 7 at NIU 27, up 14 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 7:404th & 20 at NIU 36, up 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 4:164th & 4 at NIU 38, up 14 · Punted−1.0 pts
- Q1 14:074th & 8 at SDSU 37, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 9:044th & 10 at SDSU 27, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 0:134th & 5 at SDSU 31, down 8 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 10:544th & 21 at SDSU 41, down 5 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 9:004th & 3 at SDSU 46, down 4 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 3:424th & 1 at USA 37, down 18 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 0:254th & 15 at SDSU 26, down 18 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 13:074th & 1 at UNLV 38, up 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 8:164th & 6 at UNLV 31, up 7 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q1 5:294th & 1 at UNLV 32, up 10 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 15:004th & 15 at UNLV 35, up 10 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 10:314th & 1 at UNLV 40, up 3 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 1:284th & 10 at UNLV 32, up 3 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 9:554th & 1 at UNLV 47, up 19 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 0:264th & 3 at UNLV 46, up 19 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 15:004th & 1 at FRES 1, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 4:214th & 6 at FRES 29, tied · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q2 4:164th & 11 at FRES 37, up 10 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 9:444th & 18 at FRES 45, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 11:024th & 7 at SDSU 13, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 2:164th & 8 at FRES 40, up 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 15:004th & 8 at SDSU 38, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 1:044th & 4 at USU 4, tied · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q2 4:444th & 3 at SDSU 34, up 10 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 0:004th & 9 at USU 24, up 10 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 8:244th & 7 at USU 26, up 13 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 14:494th & 6 at USU 6, up 16 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 7:554th & 8 at SDSU 30, up 27 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 14:544th & 19 at SDSU 36, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 3:454th & 5 at HAW 13, up 21 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 1:094th & 6 at HAW 49, up 24 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 13:294th & 22 at HAW 34, up 27 · Went for itClose call
- Q3 11:334th & 22 at HAW 34, up 27 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 11:334th & 5 at HAW 46, up 27 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 4:184th & 6 at SDSU 38, up 34 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 10:274th & 5 at SDSU 30, up 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 5:484th & 8 at SDSU 47, up 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 7:494th & 10 at WYO 10, up 4 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 6:264th & 1 at SDSU 40, up 7 · Punted−1.7 pts
- Q3 4:154th & 9 at SDSU 29, up 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 10:454th & 12 at WYO 14, up 4 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 9:454th & 15 at SDSU 45, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 12:314th & 2 at SDSU 38, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 11:394th & 10 at CSU 17, down 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 4:594th & 1 at SDSU 40, down 11 · Punted−1.5 pts
- Q3 15:004th & 20 at SDSU 38, down 18 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 2:314th & 4 at SDSU 43, down 25 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 12:474th & 8 at SDSU 34, down 39 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 13:534th & 16 at SDSU 19, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 9:274th & 7 at SDSU 11, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 9:394th & 9 at WYO 20, down 3 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 4:484th & 12 at SDSU 11, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 8:294th & 9 at SDSU 42, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 1:254th & 1 at WYO 6, up 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 11:494th & 5 at WYO 44, up 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 6:544th & 2 at WYO 3, up 7 · Kicked a field goal−2.4 pts
- Q1 13:174th & 10 at SDSU 25, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 10:094th & 20 at SDSU 5, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 5:124th & 3 at SDSU 32, down 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 12:294th & 22 at SDSU 47, down 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 6:284th & 4 at HOU 5, down 10 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q2 1:294th & 6 at HOU 11, down 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 10:464th & 2 at HOU 46, down 4 · Punted−1.9 pts
- Q4 10:184th & 9 at SDSU 46, up 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 5:084th & 4 at HOU 46, up 17 · PuntedClose call
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Costliest tries against the numbers
- at WYOQ4 0:00 Touchdown, down 1 before the tryWent for two; the numbers favored kicking−1.9 pts
- at USAQ3 3:06 Touchdown, up 1 before the tryWent for two; the numbers favored kicking (close call)−0.2 pts
- vs UNLVQ4 12:47 Touchdown, up 19 before the tryWent for two; the numbers favored kicking (close call)−0.2 pts
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2016
56th of 128 FBS teams at beating the model's pregame expectations
Expected wins adds up San Diego State's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7. Based on 13 of 14 games; one has no play-by-play to score.
What moved it, 2016
Every game starts at San Diego State's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard+1.54
- Possession & field position+0.04
- Clock+0.03
- Timeouts+0.01
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff−1.27
Game by game
- CALW 45-40 vs CAL71% → 94%Before kickoff +21 · On the field +24: Scoreboard +28, Timeouts +2
- NIUW 42-28 at NIU70% → 97%Before kickoff +20 · On the field +28: Scoreboard +39, Clock +1
- USAL 24-42 at USA86% → 1%Before kickoff +36 · On the field −85: Scoreboard −55, Clock −1
- UNLVW 26-7 vs UNLV87% → 98%Before kickoff +37 · On the field +11: Scoreboard +19, Timeouts −1
- FRESW 17-3 at FRES87% → 99%Before kickoff +37 · On the field +12: Scoreboard +23, Clock +1
- SJSUW 42-3 vs SJSU92% → 100%Before kickoff +42 · On the field +8: Scoreboard +11
- USUW 40-13 at USU57% → 100%Before kickoff +7 · On the field +43: Scoreboard +47, Clock +1
- HAWW 55-0 vs HAW88% → 100%Before kickoff +38 · On the field +12: Scoreboard +15
- NEVW 46-16 at NEV89% → 100%Before kickoff +39 · On the field +11: Scoreboard +17
- WYOL 33-34 at WYO69% → 31%Before kickoff +19 · On the field −39: Scoreboard −9, Possession & field position +2
- CSUL 31-63 vs CSU79% → 0%Before kickoff +29 · On the field −79: Scoreboard −70, Clock −1
- WYOW 27-24 at WYO68% → 95%Before kickoff +18 · On the field +28: Scoreboard +38, Clock +2
- HOUW 34-10 vs HOU37% → 100%Before kickoff −13 · On the field +63: Scoreboard +53, Timeouts +1
Points of win probability, from San Diego State's side.
Closest call
TOL 14-17 SDSU (2022) - San Diego State dropped to a 13.4% win probability before pulling it out.
Season arc, 2016
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is San Diego State's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2016
The largest single-play change in San Diego State's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
San Diego State's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
San Diego State's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
San Diego State's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
San Diego State's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.