Hawai'i
- SP+
- −2.3 (#86)
- FPI
- −9.1 (#102)
- SRS
- −7.8 (#99)
- Resume
- #90
Next game
Advanced stats
CollegeFootballData's play-by-play measures of how efficient and explosive a team was, placed against every other FBS team. How it works →
Profile vs. FBS, 2021
Farther out is better on every spoke. Dashed ring: the FBS median.
- EPA per playExpected points added on an average snap: how much each play moved the scoring odds.
- Success rateShare of snaps that stayed on schedule: half the yards needed on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of them on 3rd or 4th.
- ExplosivenessAverage EPA on the successful snaps: how big the good plays were.
- Rushing EPAEPA per designed run.
- Passing EPAEPA per pass play.
- Standard downsSuccess rate on downs where either a run or a pass makes sense, like 1st and 10 or 3rd and 2.
- Passing downsSuccess rate on downs that all but force a pass, like 2nd and 8 or longer, or 3rd and 5 or longer.
- Line yardsRushing yards per carry credited to the offensive line, weighting the first few yards most.
- Stuff rateShare of runs stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage.
- HavocShare of snaps with a tackle for loss, sack, forced fumble, interception or pass breakup.
Percentiles among the 130 FBS teams this season, where higher is better for the offense and the defense alike (a defense's numbers are what it allowed). The line in each bar is the FBS median. Garbage time excluded. Source: CollegeFootballData.
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2021
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Hawai'i allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season. Ranks are among FBS teams.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Hawai'i.
Players
YardLine's player model credits every play's value to the players involved, so each one's season can be measured in wins above a typical backup. How it works →
Players, 2021
Quarterback is the most valuable starting slot by a wide margin: the gap between a top-decile and a median FBS quarterback is about twice the gap at any other position.
- Chevan CordeiroQB319 plays · +0.211 pts/play · 80th of 219 QBs1.26WAR0.71 to 1.82
- Calvin Turner Jr.RB138 plays · +0.170 pts/play · 84th of 387 RBs0.44WAR0.30 to 0.56
- Dedrick ParsonRB115 plays · +0.187 pts/play · 100th of 387 RBs0.40WAR0.33 to 0.48
- Brayden SchagerQB90 plays · +0.211 pts/play · 154th of 219 QBs0.36WAR0.17 to 0.56
- Dae Dae HunterRB85 plays · +0.193 pts/play · 147th of 387 RBs0.31WAR0.24 to 0.37
- Matthew ShipleyPK59 plays · +0.130 pts/play · 7th of 128 kickers0.14WAR0.07 to 0.23
- Nick MardnerWR55 plays · +0.140 pts/play · 147th of 474 WRs0.14WAR0.08 to 0.21
- Jared SmartWR22 plays · +0.154 pts/play · 342nd of 474 WRs0.06WAR0.04 to 0.09
Every player (9)
- Caleb PhillipsTE15 plays · −0.020 pts/play · 41st of 234 TEs−0.01WAR−0.03 to 0.01
By position group, against FBS
Linemen and defenders are valued as units, in points per game against the median FBS unit, because play-by-play doesn't say who was on the field. Players are valued against a replacement-level backup, so the two aren't added together.
Wins above replacement credits each play's expected points to the players involved, adjusted for the opponent, and compares Hawai'i's players with a typical backup; 53 points make a win. Only snaps while the game was in doubt count, so a starter on a team that blows opponents out plays fewer of them: read value per play beside WAR. The line under each player (or the range on a phone) is the 90% interval. Ranks are among FBS teams and players. How this works
Transfer portal, 2021
6 players transferred in and 10 out. WAR is each one's 2020 season, before the move. Every team's portal
In 2021, the arrivals have added 0.00 WAR at Hawai'i and the departures 0.12 wherever they went.
No quarterbacks, skill players or specialists with FBS snaps.
- Miles ReedRB · 2★to Stephen F. Austin0.24-
- Melquise StovallWR · 3★to Pittsburgh0.070.03
- Lincoln VictorWR · 3★to Washington State-0.09
The other 7
- Caden HilbornDL · 3★to undecided--
- Paul ScottLB · 3★to undecided--
- Zach BowersLB · 3★to undecided--
- Akil FranciscoCB · 2★to Western Illinois--
- Ernest MooreOT · 2★to Southwest Minnesota State--
- Kaimana Wa'aIOL · 2★to Texas State--
- Quin BrightWRto Blinn College--
Only quarterbacks, skill players and specialists have a WAR of their own, so they make up these totals; linemen and defenders count in the moves but add none. 2020 is the player's season at his old school, 2021 his season after the move. A dash means no FBS snaps that season. Rosters tie CFBD's portal entries to players, which works for about 19 in 20 skill-position moves.
Talent and roster
How much talent the roster had, by recruiting ratings, and how much of it showed up on the field, against every other FBS team. How it works →
What it had and what it did, 2021
- Roster talent: 397, 105th of 130 in FBSRoster talent247Sports' talent composite: the recruiting ratings of every player on the roster, transfers included.
- Recruiting: 121, 121st of 130 in FBSRecruitingAverage 247Sports class score over this season's class and the three before it.
- Returning production: 76%, 62nd of 128 in FBSReturning productionShare of last season's production (expected points added) by players still on the roster.
- SP+ rating: −2.3, 86th of 130 in FBSSP+ ratingThe result: Bill Connelly's opponent-adjusted rating, points per game better than an average FBS team.
Ranks and bars among the 130 FBS teams with a talent rating this season, best first; the line in each bar is the FBS median.
Talent conversion
Hawai'i's SP+ of −2.3 is 4.9 points above the −7.2 its roster talent predicts, 51st of 130 in FBS.
The same comparison on each side of the ball, positive is better for both.
Conversion by season
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2021
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Hawai'i's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 4 clear-cut ones account for 0.07 of the 0.15 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right. Ranks are among FBS teams; 1st gave up the least.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- vs SDSUQ4 3:00 4th & 5 at SDSU 5, down 10Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it−2.5 pts
- vs CSUQ4 13:48 4th & 1 at HAW 28, up 12Punted; the numbers favored going for it−2.4 pts
- at NMSUQ3 12:07 4th & 4 at NMSU 43, up 1Punted; the numbers favored going for it−1.3 pts
- vs SJSUQ2 5:26 4th & 1 at HAW 34, tiedPunted; the numbers favored going for it−1.3 pts
- vs CSUQ4 9:09 4th & 5 at CSU 40, up 12Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.9 pts
- vs SJSUQ3 8:05 4th & 4 at SJSU 8, down 7Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.8 pts
- at UCLAQ2 1:49 4th & 11 at UCLA 11, down 28Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.7 pts
- vs CSUQ3 7:17 4th & 2 at CSU 24, up 26Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.6 pts
Every call this season (98)
- Q1 12:584th & 6 at HAW 29, tied · Went for itClose call
- Q1 10:194th & 8 at HAW 27, down 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 1:474th & 10 at UCLA 31, down 17 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 14:064th & 9 at UCLA 39, down 21 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 9:314th & 4 at HAW 42, down 28 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 1:494th & 11 at UCLA 11, down 28 · Went for itClose call
- Q3 11:204th & 17 at HAW 18, down 34 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 10:114th & 10 at HAW 25, down 41 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 13:494th & 8 at HAW 3, down 34 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 0:594th & 3 at UCLA 31, down 34 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 8:134th & 22 at ORST 42, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 5:434th & 7 at HAW 25, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 3:114th & 10 at midfield, down 17 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 12:324th & 13 at ORST 34, down 24 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 3:014th & 10 at ORST 45, down 18 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 1:074th & 18 at ORST 41, down 18 · Went for itClose call
- Q1 12:374th & 6 at HAW 18, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 2:164th & 2 at HAW 42, up 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 13:444th & 3 at HAW 12, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 10:454th & 15 at HAW 47, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 5:264th & 1 at HAW 34, tied · Punted−1.3 pts
- Q2 2:204th & 2 at HAW 33, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 14:554th & 10 at HAW 40, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 12:054th & 15 at SJSU 49, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 8:054th & 4 at SJSU 8, down 7 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q3 3:294th & 6 at SJSU 6, down 4 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 2:054th & 12 at HAW 37, down 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 12:294th & 5 at HAW 43, down 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 7:344th & 5 at HAW 38, down 1 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 0:254th & 10 at SJSU 33, down 4 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 5:064th & 13 at FRES 17, up 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 4:134th & 11 at HAW 24, up 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 13:334th & 5 at HAW 6, up 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 4:394th & 9 at HAW 21, down 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 15:004th & 10 at HAW 48, down 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 9:164th & 9 at FRES 39, down 11 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 4:294th & 10 at FRES 33, down 14 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 3:334th & 6 at FRES 16, tied · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 5:194th & 1 at HAW 40, up 4 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 0:084th & 4 at HAW 42, up 4 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 4:124th & 11 at NEV 11, down 3 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 1:484th & 17 at HAW 35, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 14:504th & 7 at NEV 49, down 17 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 11:564th & 3 at HAW 24, down 17 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 4:354th & 3 at NEV 32, down 20 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 0:534th & 23 at HAW 33, down 20 · Went for itClose call
- Q1 13:114th & 7 at HAW 28, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 13:114th & 7 at HAW 28, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 1:114th & 11 at USU 47, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 1:114th & 11 at USU 47, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 8:514th & 5 at USU 32, down 17 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q3 10:524th & 5 at USU 47, down 17 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 7:254th & 11 at HAW 24, down 24 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 3:534th & 3 at USU 37, down 31 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 9:174th & 7 at HAW 28, down 19 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 0:064th & 16 at HAW 7, down 13 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 12:474th & 3 at HAW 9, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q1 6:274th & 15 at HAW 31, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 7:114th & 13 at HAW 48, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 1:004th & 5 at HAW 36, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 15:004th & 13 at HAW 22, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 7:224th & 15 at HAW 47, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 3:004th & 5 at SDSU 5, down 10 · Kicked a field goal−2.5 pts
- Q4 1:114th & 5 at SDSU 35, down 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 11:564th & 8 at UNLV 26, up 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 5:544th & 9 at HAW 42, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 2:214th & 7 at UNLV 15, tied · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 9:034th & 5 at HAW 9, up 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 11:134th & 4 at HAW 43, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 1:344th & 8 at HAW 17, down 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 2:114th & 2 at HAW 46, down 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 12:524th & 3 at CSU 25, tied · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q1 9:024th & 20 at CSU 26, down 4 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 4:034th & 3 at CSU 17, down 1 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q2 6:444th & 4 at HAW 10, up 6 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 1:434th & 10 at HAW 41, up 12 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 7:174th & 2 at CSU 24, up 26 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q3 3:254th & 19 at CSU 44, up 19 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 13:484th & 1 at HAW 28, up 12 · Punted−2.4 pts
- Q4 9:094th & 5 at CSU 40, up 12 · PuntedClose call
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Costliest tries against the numbers
- vs NMSUQ4 4:16 Touchdown, up 13 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)−0.4 pts
- at WYOQ4 6:27 Touchdown, up 23 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)−0.3 pts
- at ORSTQ4 10:28 Touchdown, down 12 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)−0.2 pts
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2021
39th of 130 FBS teams at beating the model's pregame expectations
Expected wins adds up Hawai'i's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2021
Every game starts at Hawai'i's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard+0.18
- Possession & field position+0.03
- Clock−0.03
- Timeouts+0.03
- Other+0.01
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.88
Game by game
- UCLAL 10-44 at UCLA10% → 0%Before kickoff −40 · On the field −10: Scoreboard −13
- PRSTW 49-35 vs PRST95% → 98%Before kickoff +45 · On the field +3: Scoreboard +10
- ORSTL 27-45 at ORST21% → 2%Before kickoff −29 · On the field −19: Scoreboard −24, Possession & field position −1
- SJSUL 13-17 vs SJSU26% → 23%Before kickoff −24 · On the field −3: Scoreboard −32, Clock −3
- NMSUW 41-21 at NMSU79% → 95%Before kickoff +29 · On the field +16: Scoreboard +31, Clock +2
- FRESW 27-24 vs FRES18% → 94%Before kickoff −32 · On the field +76: Scoreboard +41, Timeouts +3
- NEVL 17-34 at NEV14% → 0%Before kickoff −36 · On the field −13: Scoreboard −17, Timeouts −1
- NMSUW 48-34 vs NMSU82% → 99%Before kickoff +32 · On the field +18: Scoreboard +23
- USUL 31-51 at USU38% → 2%Before kickoff −12 · On the field −36: Scoreboard −33, Possession & field position −2
- SDSUL 10-17 vs SDSU27% → 14%Before kickoff −23 · On the field −12: Scoreboard −34, Timeouts −1
- UNLVL 13-27 at UNLV56% → 5%Before kickoff +6 · On the field −51: Scoreboard −39, Clock −2
- CSUW 50-45 vs CSU39% → 96%Before kickoff −11 · On the field +57: Scoreboard +40, Timeouts +2
- WYOW 38-14 at WYO16% → 99%Before kickoff −34 · On the field +83: Scoreboard +66, Clock +2
Points of win probability, from Hawai'i's side.
Closest call
STAN 20-23 HAW (2025) - Hawai'i dropped to a 0.3% win probability before pulling it out.
Season arc, 2021
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Hawai'i's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2021
The largest single-play change in Hawai'i's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Hawai'i's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Hawai'i's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Hawai'i's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Hawai'i's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.