Washington State
- SP+
- +6.7 (#57)
- FPI
- +2.7 (#54)
- SRS
- +4.5 (#52)
- Resume
- #54
Next game
Advanced stats
CollegeFootballData's play-by-play measures of how efficient and explosive a team was, placed against every other FBS team. How it works →
Profile vs. FBS, 2021
Farther out is better on every spoke. Dashed ring: the FBS median.
- EPA per playExpected points added on an average snap: how much each play moved the scoring odds.
- Success rateShare of snaps that stayed on schedule: half the yards needed on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of them on 3rd or 4th.
- ExplosivenessAverage EPA on the successful snaps: how big the good plays were.
- Rushing EPAEPA per designed run.
- Passing EPAEPA per pass play.
- Standard downsSuccess rate on downs where either a run or a pass makes sense, like 1st and 10 or 3rd and 2.
- Passing downsSuccess rate on downs that all but force a pass, like 2nd and 8 or longer, or 3rd and 5 or longer.
- Line yardsRushing yards per carry credited to the offensive line, weighting the first few yards most.
- Stuff rateShare of runs stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage.
- HavocShare of snaps with a tackle for loss, sack, forced fumble, interception or pass breakup.
Percentiles among the 130 FBS teams this season, where higher is better for the offense and the defense alike (a defense's numbers are what it allowed). The line in each bar is the FBS median. Garbage time excluded. Source: CollegeFootballData.
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2021
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Washington State allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season. Ranks are among FBS teams.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Washington State.
Players
YardLine's player model credits every play's value to the players involved, so each one's season can be measured in wins above a typical backup. How it works →
Players, 2021
Quarterback is the most valuable starting slot by a wide margin: the gap between a top-decile and a median FBS quarterback is about twice the gap at any other position.
- Jayden de LauraQB334 plays · +0.223 pts/play · 66th of 219 QBs1.39WAR0.75 to 2.05
- Max BorghiRB148 plays · +0.193 pts/play · 60th of 387 RBs0.53WAR0.39 to 0.67
- Deon McIntoshRB101 plays · +0.192 pts/play · 114th of 387 RBs0.36WAR0.27 to 0.45
- Travell HarrisWR70 plays · +0.166 pts/play · 52nd of 474 WRs0.22WAR0.14 to 0.29
- Calvin Jackson Jr.WR81 plays · +0.134 pts/play · 65th of 474 WRs0.20WAR0.12 to 0.29
- Jarrett GuarantanoQB61 plays · +0.147 pts/play · 182nd of 219 QBs0.17WAR0.04 to 0.29
- De'Zhaun StriblingWR46 plays · +0.194 pts/play · 103rd of 474 WRs0.17WAR0.12 to 0.21
- Lincoln VictorWR26 plays · +0.183 pts/play · 261st of 474 WRs0.09WAR0.06 to 0.12
Every player (12)
- Donovan OllieWR35 plays · +0.136 pts/play · 261st of 474 WRs0.09WAR0.05 to 0.13
- Dean JanikowskiPK14 plays · +0.283 pts/play · 63rd of 128 kickers0.07WAR0.05 to 0.11
- Nick HabererP43 plays · +0.084 pts/play · 74th of 101 punters0.07WAR−0.01 to 0.15
- Nakia WatsonRB24 plays · +0.151 pts/play · 308th of 387 RBs0.07WAR0.05 to 0.09
By position group, against FBS
Linemen and defenders are valued as units, in points per game against the median FBS unit, because play-by-play doesn't say who was on the field. Players are valued against a replacement-level backup, so the two aren't added together.
Wins above replacement credits each play's expected points to the players involved, adjusted for the opponent, and compares Washington State's players with a typical backup; 53 points make a win. Only snaps while the game was in doubt count, so a starter on a team that blows opponents out plays fewer of them: read value per play beside WAR. The line under each player (or the range on a phone) is the 90% interval. Ranks are among FBS teams and players. How this works
Transfer portal, 2021
7 players transferred in and 24 out. WAR is each one's 2020 season, before the move. Every team's portal
In 2021, the arrivals have added 0.33 WAR at Washington State and the departures 0.07 wherever they went.
- Jarrett GuarantanoDUAL · 3★from Tennessee0.470.17
- Nakia WatsonRB · 3★from Wisconsin0.130.07
- Lincoln VictorWR · 3★from Hawai'i-0.09
The other 4
- Ben WilsonILB · 3★from TCU--
- Kaleb Ford-DementCB · 3★from Old Dominion--
- Tyrone Hill Jr.CB · 3★from Buffalo--
- Jasiah Richard-LewisWRfrom Azusa Pacific--
- Blake MazzaKto SMU0.02-
- Jamire CalvinWR · 4★to Mississippi State-0.07
The other 22
- Ayden HectorCB · 4★to undecided--
- Rodrick FisherWR · 4★to undecided--
- Cosmas KweteOLB · 3★to Northern Arizona--
- Davontavean MartinWR · 3★to Oklahoma State--
- Hunter MayginnesIOL · 3★to undecided--
- Jay WilkersonWR · 3★to undecided--
- Kassidy WoodsWR · 3★to Northern Colorado--
- Lamar CampbellCB · 3★to Idaho--
- Lamonte McDougleDL · 3★to UTSA--
- Lolani LangiLB · 3★to undecided--
- Mike PettwayWR · 3★to Jacksonville State--
- Skyler ThomasS · 3★to Liberty--
- Trey DavisCB · 3★to undecided--
- Tyrese RossS · 3★to South Carolina--
- Will Rodgers IIIEDGE · 3★to Temple--
- John BledsoeQB · 2★to San Diego--
- Jon DennyOG · 2★to Idaho--
- Clay MarkoffRBto Arizona--
- Lucas BaconWRto undecided--
- Phillip PowellSto undecided--
- Uluaki KatoangaLBto undecided--
- Will HeckmanSto undecided--
Only quarterbacks, skill players and specialists have a WAR of their own, so they make up these totals; linemen and defenders count in the moves but add none. 2020 is the player's season at his old school, 2021 his season after the move. A dash means no FBS snaps that season. Rosters tie CFBD's portal entries to players, which works for about 19 in 20 skill-position moves.
Talent and roster
How much talent the roster had, by recruiting ratings, and how much of it showed up on the field, against every other FBS team. How it works →
What it had and what it did, 2021
- Roster talent: 601, 61st of 130 in FBSRoster talent247Sports' talent composite: the recruiting ratings of every player on the roster, transfers included.
- Recruiting: 180, 57th of 130 in FBSRecruitingAverage 247Sports class score over this season's class and the three before it.
- Returning production: 78%, 58th of 128 in FBSReturning productionShare of last season's production (expected points added) by players still on the roster.
- SP+ rating: +6.7, 57th of 130 in FBSSP+ ratingThe result: Bill Connelly's opponent-adjusted rating, points per game better than an average FBS team.
Ranks and bars among the 130 FBS teams with a talent rating this season, best first; the line in each bar is the FBS median.
Talent conversion
Washington State's SP+ of +6.7 is 5.3 points above the +1.4 its roster talent predicts, 48th of 130 in FBS.
The same comparison on each side of the ball, positive is better for both.
Conversion by season
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2021
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Washington State's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 4 clear-cut ones account for 0.06 of the 0.12 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right. Ranks are among FBS teams; 1st gave up the least.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- at UTAHQ2 0:00 4th & 1 at UTAH 4, down 4Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it−1.8 pts
- at OREQ3 9:57 4th & 2 at WSU 49, down 7Punted; the numbers favored going for it−1.3 pts
- vs USCQ2 4:24 4th & 9 at USC 35, up 14Punted; the numbers favored going for it−1.3 pts
- at ASUQ3 4:24 4th & 4 at WSU 49, up 11Punted; the numbers favored going for it−1.1 pts
- vs BYUQ2 2:32 4th & 4 at midfield, tiedPunted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−1.0 pts
- at CMUQ2 10:29 4th & 11 at CMU 13, down 13Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.9 pts
- at CMUQ4 7:49 4th & 13 at CMU 44, down 10Went for it; the numbers favored punting (close call)−0.8 pts
- vs USCQ4 12:46 4th & 1 at WSU 18, down 21Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.6 pts
Every call this season (96)
- Q1 11:304th & 15 at WSU 42, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 8:334th & 7 at WSU 45, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 14:574th & 5 at USU 18, down 3 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 4:174th & 6 at USU 14, down 2 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 0:544th & 9 at USU 9, down 2 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 12:114th & 11 at USU 11, up 9 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 3:024th & 6 at WSU 29, up 5 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 0:124th & 2 at USC 9, up 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 13:164th & 2 at USC 2, up 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 4:244th & 9 at USC 35, up 14 · Punted−1.3 pts
- Q3 10:324th & 3 at WSU 32, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 4:554th & 14 at WSU 21, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 0:244th & 10 at WSU 25, down 21 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 12:464th & 1 at WSU 18, down 21 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 6:194th & 3 at WSU 36, down 24 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 2:224th & 8 at WSU 38, down 31 · Went for itClose call
- Q1 11:254th & 1 at UTAH 34, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 8:434th & 2 at UTAH 37, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 10:344th & 15 at UTAH 22, tied · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 6:324th & 13 at WSU 47, up 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:494th & 1 at UTAH 16, down 4 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 0:004th & 1 at UTAH 4, down 4 · Kicked a field goal−1.8 pts
- Q3 3:394th & 17 at WSU 25, up 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 12:454th & 6 at WSU 43, up 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 8:424th & 5 at WSU 25, up 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 2:194th & 8 at WSU 41, down 4 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 0:504th & 25 at WSU 22, down 11 · Went for itClose call
- Q1 7:024th & 6 at WSU 29, up 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 1:464th & 5 at CAL 5, up 8 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 14:134th & 9 at WSU 43, up 11 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 3:044th & 3 at CAL 34, up 11 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 3:534th & 9 at WSU 42, up 15 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 14:454th & 9 at WSU 29, up 15 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 14:454th & 9 at WSU 29, up 15 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 8:434th & 5 at WSU 23, up 15 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 3:234th & 18 at WSU 49, up 15 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 12:334th & 3 at ASU 32, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 10:534th & 1 at ASU 42, up 11 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 12:524th & 2 at WSU 33, up 11 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 10:324th & 10 at WSU 36, up 11 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 4:244th & 4 at WSU 49, up 11 · Punted−1.1 pts
- Q4 14:544th & 12 at ASU 23, up 11 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 6:504th & 10 at ASU 15, up 11 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 1:374th & 16 at ASU 27, up 11 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 9:364th & 10 at WSU 30, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 0:004th & 10 at WSU 23, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 9:224th & 3 at WSU 29, down 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 9:574th & 2 at WSU 49, down 7 · Punted−1.3 pts
- Q3 2:044th & 6 at WSU 29, down 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 8:314th & 16 at ORE 17, down 10 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 13:284th & 9 at WSU 36, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 14:534th & 2 at WSU 40, up 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 9:314th & 6 at WSU 38, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 15:004th & 1 at WSU 34, up 27 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 0:274th & 1 at WSU 34, up 27 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 9:294th & 17 at WSU 35, up 19 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 6:024th & 12 at ARIZ 47, up 26 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 12:404th & 9 at WSU 29, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 9:114th & 4 at WSU 34, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 5:334th & 10 at WSU 18, down 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 10:294th & 11 at CMU 13, down 13 · Went for itClose call
- Q2 4:364th & 2 at WSU 16, down 13 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 2:344th & 17 at WSU 15, down 13 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:574th & 3 at WSU 29, down 21 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 13:474th & 12 at WSU 16, down 21 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 8:564th & 10 at WSU 4, down 21 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 2:244th & 5 at CMU 5, down 14 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 10:374th & 1 at WSU 32, down 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 7:494th & 13 at CMU 44, down 10 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 2:044th & 5 at WSU 19, down 3 · Went for itAgreed
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Costliest tries against the numbers
- at CMUQ4 3:13 Touchdown, down 4 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)−0.6 pts
- at OREQ4 0:09 Touchdown, down 15 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)−0.1 pts
- at WASHQ4 8:23 Touchdown, up 26 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)<0.1 pts
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2021
47th of 130 FBS teams at beating the model's pregame expectations
Expected wins adds up Washington State's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2021
Every game starts at Washington State's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard+0.82
- Clock+0.03
- Timeouts−0.03
- Other+0.01
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.13
Game by game
- USUL 23-26 vs USU90% → 26%Before kickoff +40 · On the field −64: Scoreboard −29, Clock −2
- PRSTW 44-24 vs PRST97% → 99%Before kickoff +47 · On the field +2: Scoreboard +6
- USCL 14-45 vs USC28% → 0%Before kickoff −22 · On the field −28: Scoreboard −34, Clock −1
- UTAHL 13-24 at UTAH19% → 2%Before kickoff −31 · On the field −16: Scoreboard −21, Possession & field position −1
- CALW 21-6 at CAL27% → 99%Before kickoff −23 · On the field +72: Scoreboard +62, Clock +3
- ORSTW 31-24 vs ORST42% → 91%Before kickoff −8 · On the field +49: Scoreboard +31, Possession & field position +2
- STANW 34-31 vs STAN57% → 96%Before kickoff +7 · On the field +39: Scoreboard +34, Timeouts +1
- BYUL 19-21 vs BYU45% → 15%Before kickoff −5 · On the field −30: Scoreboard −37, Clock −4
- ASUW 34-21 at ASU13% → 98%Before kickoff −37 · On the field +85: Scoreboard +61, Clock +3
- OREL 24-38 at ORE17% → 1%Before kickoff −33 · On the field −16: Scoreboard −21, Timeouts −1
- ARIZW 44-18 vs ARIZ86% → 100%Before kickoff +36 · On the field +14: Scoreboard +17
- WASHW 40-13 at WASH50% → 100%Before kickoff 0 · On the field +50: Scoreboard +51, Clock +2
- CMUL 21-24 at CMU66% → 6%Before kickoff +16 · On the field −60: Scoreboard −39, Timeouts −2
Points of win probability, from Washington State's side.
Closest call
BOIS 44-47 WSU (2017) - Washington State dropped to a 1.9% win probability before pulling it out.
Season arc, 2021
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Washington State's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2021
The largest single-play change in Washington State's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Washington State's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Washington State's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Washington State's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Washington State's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.