Kansas State
- SP+
- +14.2 (#21)
- FPI
- +7.2 (#35)
- SRS
- +8.6 (#28)
- Resume
- #53
Next game
Advanced stats
CollegeFootballData's play-by-play measures of how efficient and explosive a team was, placed against every other FBS team. How it works →
Profile vs. FBS, 2021
Farther out is better on every spoke. Dashed ring: the FBS median.
- EPA per playExpected points added on an average snap: how much each play moved the scoring odds.
- Success rateShare of snaps that stayed on schedule: half the yards needed on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of them on 3rd or 4th.
- ExplosivenessAverage EPA on the successful snaps: how big the good plays were.
- Rushing EPAEPA per designed run.
- Passing EPAEPA per pass play.
- Standard downsSuccess rate on downs where either a run or a pass makes sense, like 1st and 10 or 3rd and 2.
- Passing downsSuccess rate on downs that all but force a pass, like 2nd and 8 or longer, or 3rd and 5 or longer.
- Line yardsRushing yards per carry credited to the offensive line, weighting the first few yards most.
- Stuff rateShare of runs stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage.
- HavocShare of snaps with a tackle for loss, sack, forced fumble, interception or pass breakup.
Percentiles among the 130 FBS teams this season, where higher is better for the offense and the defense alike (a defense's numbers are what it allowed). The line in each bar is the FBS median. Garbage time excluded. Source: CollegeFootballData.
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2021
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Kansas State allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season. Ranks are among FBS teams.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Kansas State.
Players
YardLine's player model credits every play's value to the players involved, so each one's season can be measured in wins above a typical backup. How it works →
Players, 2021
Quarterback is the most valuable starting slot by a wide margin: the gap between a top-decile and a median FBS quarterback is about twice the gap at any other position.
- Skylar ThompsonQB250 plays · +0.337 pts/play · 56th of 219 QBs1.58WAR1.03 to 2.11
- Deuce VaughnRB222 plays · +0.192 pts/play · 21st of 387 RBs0.80WAR0.55 to 1.01
- Will HowardQB57 plays · +0.175 pts/play · 180th of 219 QBs0.19WAR0.05 to 0.33
- Joe ErvinRB46 plays · +0.206 pts/play · 232nd of 387 RBs0.18WAR0.13 to 0.22
- Ty ZentnerP36 plays · +0.253 pts/play · 18th of 101 punters0.17WAR0.09 to 0.25
- Phillip BrooksWR50 plays · +0.165 pts/play · 126th of 474 WRs0.15WAR0.10 to 0.21
- Malik KnowlesWR52 plays · +0.128 pts/play · 177th of 474 WRs0.12WAR0.07 to 0.18
- Jax DineenFB3 plays · +0.137 pts/play · 372nd of 387 RBs0.01WAR0.00 to 0.01
Every player (12)
- Daniel ImatorbhebheTE12 plays · +0.024 pts/play · 41st of 234 TEs0.01WAR−0.01 to 0.02
- Chabastin TaylorWR1 plays · +0.141 pts/play · 463rd of 474 WRs0.00WAR0.00 to 0.00
- Sammy WheelerTE19 plays · −0.000 pts/play · 41st of 234 TEs0.00WAR−0.03 to 0.02
- Nick LennersTE7 plays · −0.030 pts/play · 41st of 234 TEs0.00WAR−0.01 to 0.01
By position group, against FBS
Linemen and defenders are valued as units, in points per game against the median FBS unit, because play-by-play doesn't say who was on the field. Players are valued against a replacement-level backup, so the two aren't added together.
Wins above replacement credits each play's expected points to the players involved, adjusted for the opponent, and compares Kansas State's players with a typical backup; 53 points make a win. Only snaps while the game was in doubt count, so a starter on a team that blows opponents out plays fewer of them: read value per play beside WAR. The line under each player (or the range on a phone) is the 90% interval. Ranks are among FBS teams and players. How this works
Transfer portal, 2021
8 players transferred in and 15 out. WAR is each one's 2020 season, before the move. Every team's portal
In 2021, the arrivals have added 0.01 WAR at Kansas State and the departures 0.18 wherever they went.
- Daniel ImatorbhebheTE · 3★from Illinois-0.01
The other 7
- Julius BrentsS · 3★from Iowa--
- Russ YeastS · 3★from Louisville--
- Timmy HorneDL · 3★from Charlotte--
- Kade WarnerWR · 2★from Nebraska--
- Reggie StubblefieldS · 2★from Prairie View A&M--
- Eric MunozLBfrom Utah State--
- Gabe GarberATHfrom Kansas--
- Wykeen GillWRto Duquesne0.01-
- Josh YoungbloodWR · 3★to Rutgers0.00-
- Keyon MozeeRB · 3★to Miami (OH)-0.18
The other 12
- D.J. RenderWR · 3★to Austin Peay--
- DeMarrquese HayesOLB · 3★to Texas State--
- Jeremiah HarrisLB · 3★to Prairie View A&M--
- Jonathan AlexanderS · 3★to Mississippi State--
- Lance RobinsonCB · 3★to Tulane--
- Matthew Pola-MaoDL · 3★to Arizona State--
- Ronald TripletteEDGE · 3★to UTSA--
- Thomas GraysonRB · 3★to Central Oklahoma--
- Tyrone LewisS · 3★to Louisiana--
- Will JonesCB · 3★to South Florida--
- Nick AstQBto UTEP--
- Walter NeilCBto UTEP--
Only quarterbacks, skill players and specialists have a WAR of their own, so they make up these totals; linemen and defenders count in the moves but add none. 2020 is the player's season at his old school, 2021 his season after the move. A dash means no FBS snaps that season. Rosters tie CFBD's portal entries to players, which works for about 19 in 20 skill-position moves.
Talent and roster
How much talent the roster had, by recruiting ratings, and how much of it showed up on the field, against every other FBS team. How it works →
What it had and what it did, 2021
- Roster talent: 570, 67th of 130 in FBSRoster talent247Sports' talent composite: the recruiting ratings of every player on the roster, transfers included.
- Recruiting: 178, 60th of 130 in FBSRecruitingAverage 247Sports class score over this season's class and the three before it.
- Returning production: 91%, 23rd of 128 in FBSReturning productionShare of last season's production (expected points added) by players still on the roster.
- SP+ rating: +14.2, 21st of 130 in FBSSP+ ratingThe result: Bill Connelly's opponent-adjusted rating, points per game better than an average FBS team.
Ranks and bars among the 130 FBS teams with a talent rating this season, best first; the line in each bar is the FBS median.
Talent conversion
Kansas State's SP+ of +14.2 is 14.4 points above the −0.2 its roster talent predicts, 13th of 130 in FBS.
The same comparison on each side of the ball, positive is better for both.
Conversion by season
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2021
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Kansas State's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 2 clear-cut ones account for 0.03 of the 0.06 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right. Ranks are among FBS teams; 1st gave up the least.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- at TEXQ2 7:59 4th & 1 at KSU 48, up 1Punted; the numbers favored going for it−1.7 pts
- vs OUQ4 13:05 4th & 13 at OU 48, down 10Went for it; the numbers favored punting−1.5 pts
- vs ISUQ4 5:05 4th & 8 at ISU 9, down 17Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.7 pts
- at KUQ2 8:03 4th & 2 at midfield, up 8Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.5 pts
- vs WVUQ3 2:25 4th & 4 at WVU 8, up 14Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.4 pts
- vs WVUQ2 2:57 4th & 4 at WVU 14, up 14Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.3 pts
- vs ISUQ2 12:10 4th & 3 at ISU 15, down 3Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.3 pts
- at OKSTQ3 7:44 4th & 2 at KSU 42, down 21Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.3 pts
Every call this season (81)
- Q1 14:544th & 1 at OKST 15, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 8:514th & 10 at OKST 14, tied · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 0:334th & 8 at OKST 44, down 11 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 0:334th & 8 at OKST 44, down 11 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 8:484th & 2 at KSU 33, down 18 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 8:484th & 2 at KSU 33, down 18 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 11:134th & 7 at KSU 34, down 21 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 7:444th & 2 at KSU 42, down 21 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 3:194th & 3 at OKST 47, down 21 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 3:194th & 3 at OKST 47, down 21 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 14:444th & 15 at KSU 25, down 21 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 11:404th & 4 at KSU 13, down 21 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 5:454th & 22 at KSU 20, down 24 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 10:004th & 5 at OU 40, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 0:114th & 2 at OU 2, down 3 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 7:204th & 4 at OU 46, down 3 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 1:304th & 12 at OU 12, down 3 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 9:574th & 7 at KSU 20, down 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 13:054th & 13 at OU 48, down 10 · Went for it−1.5 pts
- Q4 6:124th & 1 at midfield, down 17 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 10:124th & 15 at KSU 21, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 3:294th & 4 at TTU 29, down 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 6:194th & 6 at midfield, down 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 2:404th & 6 at TTU 6, down 14 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 12:474th & 2 at KSU 33, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 9:084th & 1 at TTU 2, down 12 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 5:274th & 7 at KSU 32, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 13:394th & 10 at KSU 38, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 6:034th & 17 at WVU 38, up 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 2:574th & 4 at WVU 14, up 14 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q3 2:254th & 4 at WVU 8, up 14 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q4 11:444th & 8 at WVU 39, up 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 1:594th & 5 at WVU 7, up 14 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 11:094th & 4 at midfield, down 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 6:014th & 10 at BAY 37, down 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 2:084th & 20 at KSU 32, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 11:224th & 9 at BAY 46, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 11:224th & 9 at BAY 46, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 3:034th & 5 at KSU 30, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 13:594th & 6 at KSU 39, down 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 8:244th & 10 at BAY 11, down 10 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 3:394th & 6 at KSU 45, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 9:254th & 8 at BAY 21, down 10 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 8:524th & 7 at KSU 42, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 7:594th & 1 at KSU 48, up 1 · Punted−1.7 pts
- Q2 1:564th & 9 at TEX 33, up 1 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 12:004th & 15 at TEX 38, up 1 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 8:464th & 10 at KSU 42, up 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 14:514th & 4 at KSU 31, down 2 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 9:144th & 1 at KSU 30, down 2 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 4:034th & 1 at TEX 17, down 5 · Went for itAgreed
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Costliest tries against the numbers
- vs OUQ4 1:20 Touchdown, down 7 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)−0.7 pts
- vs NEVQ4 6:12 Touchdown, up 13 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)−0.4 pts
- vs WVUQ4 7:22 Touchdown, up 13 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)−0.3 pts
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2021
45th of 130 FBS teams at beating the model's pregame expectations
Expected wins adds up Kansas State's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2021
Every game starts at Kansas State's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard+0.63
- Possession & field position−0.03
- Clock−0.01
- Timeouts+0.03
- Other+0.01
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff−0.09
Game by game
- STANW 24-7 vs STAN63% → 99%Before kickoff +13 · On the field +36: Scoreboard +36, Timeouts +1
- SIUW 31-23 vs SIU90% → 94%Before kickoff +40 · On the field +4: Scoreboard +16, Timeouts +1
- NEVW 38-17 vs NEV45% → 100%Before kickoff −5 · On the field +55: Scoreboard +49, Possession & field position −2
- OKSTL 20-31 at OKST36% → 0%Before kickoff −14 · On the field −36: Scoreboard −36
- OUL 31-37 vs OU19% → 5%Before kickoff −31 · On the field −14: Scoreboard −30, Clock −2
- ISUL 20-33 vs ISU31% → 3%Before kickoff −19 · On the field −28: Scoreboard −41, Possession & field position +2
- TTUW 25-24 at TTU54% → 76%Before kickoff +4 · On the field +22: Scoreboard +31, Clock +4
- TCUW 31-12 vs TCU60% → 98%Before kickoff +10 · On the field +38: Scoreboard +38, Possession & field position −1
- KUW 35-10 at KU93% → 97%Before kickoff +43 · On the field +4: Scoreboard +17, Clock +1
- WVUW 34-17 vs WVU65% → 99%Before kickoff +15 · On the field +34: Scoreboard +34, Timeouts +2
- BAYL 10-20 vs BAY59% → 2%Before kickoff +9 · On the field −58: Scoreboard −56, Clock −3
- TEXL 17-22 at TEX45% → 12%Before kickoff −5 · On the field −32: Scoreboard −24, Clock −1
- LSUW 42-20 vs LSU71% → 100%Before kickoff +21 · On the field +29: Scoreboard +30, Timeouts +1
Points of win probability, from Kansas State's side.
Closest call
KSU 38-35 OU (2020) - Kansas State dropped to a 1.0% win probability before pulling it out.
Season arc, 2021
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Kansas State's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2021
The largest single-play change in Kansas State's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Kansas State's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Kansas State's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Kansas State's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Kansas State's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.