Louisiana
- SP+
- +8.7 (#47)
- FPI
- +4.8 (#48)
- SRS
- +5.7 (#45)
- Final AP
- #16
- Resume
- #8
Next game
Advanced stats
CollegeFootballData's play-by-play measures of how efficient and explosive a team was, placed against every other FBS team. How it works →
Profile vs. FBS, 2021
Farther out is better on every spoke. Dashed ring: the FBS median.
- EPA per playExpected points added on an average snap: how much each play moved the scoring odds.
- Success rateShare of snaps that stayed on schedule: half the yards needed on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of them on 3rd or 4th.
- ExplosivenessAverage EPA on the successful snaps: how big the good plays were.
- Rushing EPAEPA per designed run.
- Passing EPAEPA per pass play.
- Standard downsSuccess rate on downs where either a run or a pass makes sense, like 1st and 10 or 3rd and 2.
- Passing downsSuccess rate on downs that all but force a pass, like 2nd and 8 or longer, or 3rd and 5 or longer.
- Line yardsRushing yards per carry credited to the offensive line, weighting the first few yards most.
- Stuff rateShare of runs stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage.
- HavocShare of snaps with a tackle for loss, sack, forced fumble, interception or pass breakup.
Percentiles among the 130 FBS teams this season, where higher is better for the offense and the defense alike (a defense's numbers are what it allowed). The line in each bar is the FBS median. Garbage time excluded. Source: CollegeFootballData.
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2021
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Louisiana allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season. Ranks are among FBS teams.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Louisiana.
Players
YardLine's player model credits every play's value to the players involved, so each one's season can be measured in wins above a typical backup. How it works →
Players, 2021
Quarterback is the most valuable starting slot by a wide margin: the gap between a top-decile and a median FBS quarterback is about twice the gap at any other position.
- Levi LewisQB391 plays · +0.237 pts/play · 48th of 219 QBs1.73WAR0.98 to 2.41
- Montrell Johnson Jr.RB131 plays · +0.217 pts/play · 61st of 387 RBs0.53WAR0.41 to 0.68
- Chris SmithRB132 plays · +0.175 pts/play · 87th of 387 RBs0.43WAR0.28 to 0.55
- Emani BaileyRB84 plays · +0.224 pts/play · 119th of 387 RBs0.35WAR0.28 to 0.42
- Peter LeBlancWR43 plays · +0.161 pts/play · 170th of 474 WRs0.13WAR0.08 to 0.18
- Rhys ByrnsP49 plays · +0.132 pts/play · 41st of 101 punters0.12WAR0.04 to 0.23
- Kyren LacyWR33 plays · +0.163 pts/play · 234th of 474 WRs0.10WAR0.06 to 0.14
- Dontae FlemingWR26 plays · +0.152 pts/play · 299th of 474 WRs0.07WAR0.05 to 0.10
Every player (14)
- Jalen WilliamsWR14 plays · +0.200 pts/play · 378th of 474 WRs0.05WAR0.04 to 0.07
- Errol Rogers Jr.WR25 plays · +0.106 pts/play · 381st of 474 WRs0.05WAR0.03 to 0.07
- Nathanael SnyderPK8 plays · +0.159 pts/play · 118th of 128 kickers0.02WAR0.00 to 0.05
- Neal JohnsonTE21 plays · +0.007 pts/play · 41st of 234 TEs0.00WAR−0.03 to 0.04
- Johnny LumpkinTE6 plays · +0.003 pts/play · 41st of 234 TEs0.00WAR−0.01 to 0.01
- Pearse MiglTE11 plays · −0.025 pts/play · 41st of 234 TEs−0.01WAR−0.02 to 0.01
By position group, against FBS
Linemen and defenders are valued as units, in points per game against the median FBS unit, because play-by-play doesn't say who was on the field. Players are valued against a replacement-level backup, so the two aren't added together.
Wins above replacement credits each play's expected points to the players involved, adjusted for the opponent, and compares Louisiana's players with a typical backup; 53 points make a win. Only snaps while the game was in doubt count, so a starter on a team that blows opponents out plays fewer of them: read value per play beside WAR. The line under each player (or the range on a phone) is the 90% interval. Ranks are among FBS teams and players. How this works
Transfer portal, 2021
9 players transferred in and 7 out. WAR is each one's 2020 season, before the move. Every team's portal
- Lance LeGendreQB · 3★from Maryland0.01-
The other 8
- Clinton AnokwuruSDE · 3★from Kansas--
- Jacob KibodiRB · 3★from Incarnate Word--
- John StephensWR · 3★from TCU--
- Matthew AndersonOT · 3★from Nebraska--
- T.J. FiailoaIOL · 3★from UL Monroe--
- Tyrone LewisS · 3★from Kansas State--
- Ben WooldridgeQB · 2★from Fresno State--
- Michael JeffersonWRfrom Alabama State--
No quarterbacks, skill players or specialists with FBS snaps.
All 7
- Ahmad JohnsonLB · 3★to undecided--
- Brian SmithWR · 3★to undecided--
- Clifton McDowellQB · 3★to undecided--
- Glenn BealTE · 3★to undecided--
- Reginald JohnsonWR · 3★to undecided--
- Joe DillonEDGE · 2★to undecided--
- Jordan CordovaLB · 2★to undecided--
Only quarterbacks, skill players and specialists have a WAR of their own, so they make up these totals; linemen and defenders count in the moves but add none. 2020 is the player's season at his old school, 2021 his season after the move. A dash means no FBS snaps that season. Rosters tie CFBD's portal entries to players, which works for about 19 in 20 skill-position moves.
Talent and roster
How much talent the roster had, by recruiting ratings, and how much of it showed up on the field, against every other FBS team. How it works →
What it had and what it did, 2021
- Roster talent: 436, 96th of 130 in FBSRoster talent247Sports' talent composite: the recruiting ratings of every player on the roster, transfers included.
- Recruiting: 149, 82nd of 130 in FBSRecruitingAverage 247Sports class score over this season's class and the three before it.
- Returning production: 71%, 71st of 128 in FBSReturning productionShare of last season's production (expected points added) by players still on the roster.
- SP+ rating: +8.7, 47th of 130 in FBSSP+ ratingThe result: Bill Connelly's opponent-adjusted rating, points per game better than an average FBS team.
Ranks and bars among the 130 FBS teams with a talent rating this season, best first; the line in each bar is the FBS median.
Talent conversion
Louisiana's SP+ of +8.7 is 14.5 points above the −5.8 its roster talent predicts, 11th of 130 in FBS.
The same comparison on each side of the ball, positive is better for both.
Conversion by season
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2021
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Louisiana's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 1 clear-cut ones account for 0.02 of the 0.08 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right. Ranks are among FBS teams; 1st gave up the least.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- at TROYQ2 0:01 4th & 1 at UL 15, up 1Punted; the numbers favored going for it−2.0 pts
- vs NICHQ2 0:03 4th & 1 at UL 38, up 7Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−1.0 pts
- at TROYQ3 6:03 4th & 9 at TROY 27, up 8Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.8 pts
- at MRSHQ2 8:50 4th & 1 at UL 34, down 4Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.7 pts
- vs GASTQ3 2:49 4th & 5 at GAST 14, down 10Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.5 pts
- at ARSTQ4 14:22 4th & 4 at UL 39, up 1Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.5 pts
- at USAQ2 6:55 4th & 2 at UL 18, up 20Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.5 pts
- vs APPQ4 0:29 4th & 6 at APP 35, up 8Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.3 pts
Every call this season (106)
- Q1 13:294th & 2 at UL 33, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q1 8:164th & 17 at TEX 20, tied · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 0:144th & 9 at UL 38, down 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 9:454th & 3 at UL 34, down 4 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 0:314th & 1 at UL 34, down 11 · Went for itClose call
- Q3 10:104th & 1 at UL 30, down 15 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 1:104th & 14 at UL 21, down 16 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 11:244th & 1 at UL 34, down 23 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 8:204th & 12 at NICH 29, tied · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 5:524th & 1 at NICH 40, up 3 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 14:454th & 21 at NICH 47, up 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 2:144th & 7 at UL 25, up 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:034th & 1 at UL 38, up 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 8:514th & 9 at UL 32, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 1:354th & 1 at UL 31, up 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 9:294th & 11 at NICH 11, up 14 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 10:364th & 11 at UL 46, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 5:084th & 19 at UL 18, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 1:354th & 7 at UL 39, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 10:074th & 1 at OHIO 1, up 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 1:024th & 7 at OHIO 32, up 14 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q4 11:514th & 1 at OHIO 1, up 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 1:154th & 8 at OHIO 33, up 28 · Went for itClose call
- Q1 12:514th & 4 at UL 48, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q1 4:184th & 5 at UL 31, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 4:404th & 1 at UL 45, up 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 1:144th & 15 at UL 41, up 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 2:404th & 5 at UL 39, down 2 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 14:524th & 5 at GASO 48, down 2 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 10:294th & 8 at UL 49, down 2 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 4:404th & 14 at UL 36, down 2 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 0:514th & 1 at USA 33, up 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 13:484th & 9 at USA 26, up 14 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 6:554th & 2 at UL 18, up 20 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 9:064th & 2 at UL 24, up 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 10:124th & 10 at UL 25, up 2 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 3:304th & 15 at UL 27, up 2 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 13:254th & 8 at TXST 27, tied · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 8:194th & 8 at UL 18, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 14:554th & 2 at TXST 2, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 11:074th & 4 at UL 12, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:304th & 1 at UL 40, up 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 11:384th & 8 at TXST 15, up 17 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 14:444th & 18 at TXST 20, up 35 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 8:574th & 6 at TXST 32, up 38 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 0:594th & 2 at TXST 3, up 38 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 10:204th & 4 at GAST 8, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 2:214th & 7 at UL 48, down 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 8:404th & 3 at UL 39, down 3 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 0:174th & 2 at GAST 6, down 3 · Went for itClose call
- Q3 11:134th & 4 at UL 41, down 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 2:494th & 5 at GAST 14, down 10 · Went for itClose call
- Q1 12:254th & 2 at TROY 17, down 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 11:124th & 7 at TROY 36, up 4 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 9:294th & 12 at UL 31, up 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 2:344th & 8 at UL 29, up 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:014th & 1 at UL 15, up 1 · Punted−2.0 pts
- Q3 10:084th & 1 at TROY 43, up 8 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 6:034th & 9 at TROY 27, up 8 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 11:064th & 22 at UL 31, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 2:594th & 4 at UL 37, up 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 11:164th & 5 at UL 34, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 10:334th & 8 at LIB 12, tied · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 6:394th & 10 at UL 44, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 4:104th & 2 at LIB 12, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 4:104th & 3 at LIB 34, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 10:544th & 14 at UL 29, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 5:414th & 15 at UL 20, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 13:154th & 16 at UL 7, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 5:084th & 3 at LIB 5, up 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 10:244th & 1 at UL 43, up 21 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 3:484th & 2 at ULM 37, up 4 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 14:084th & 6 at ULM 38, up 11 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 10:184th & 6 at UL 29, up 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 6:114th & 7 at UL 41, up 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 1:064th & 7 at ULM 48, up 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 10:134th & 3 at ULM 28, up 4 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 13:064th & 1 at ULM 3, up 11 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 3:494th & 2 at ULM 28, up 11 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 11:574th & 3 at APP 30, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 5:244th & 24 at UL 31, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 12:544th & 16 at UL 19, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 5:174th & 11 at UL 32, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 1:284th & 5 at UL 26, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 3:024th & 2 at APP 20, up 7 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 1:164th & 15 at UL 36, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 8:164th & 4 at UL 29, up 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 0:294th & 6 at APP 35, up 8 · Went for itClose call
- Q1 1:294th & 6 at MRSH 25, up 7 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q2 14:454th & 4 at UL 19, up 3 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 11:424th & 4 at UL 17, up 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 8:504th & 1 at UL 34, down 4 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 1:284th & 8 at MRSH 8, down 4 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 0:004th & 7 at MRSH 7, down 1 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 10:054th & 1 at MRSH 12, up 2 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 5:214th & 17 at UL 40, up 2 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 14:044th & 17 at UL 45, down 5 · PuntedAgreed
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Costliest tries against the numbers
- at TEXQ4 9:31 Touchdown, down 17 before the tryWent for two; the numbers favored kicking (close call)−0.2 pts
- vs APPQ4 12:14 Touchdown, up 13 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)<0.1 pts
- vs TXSTQ3 4:50 Touchdown, up 26 before the tryWent for two; the numbers favored kicking (close call)<0.1 pts
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2021
5th of 130 FBS teams at beating the model's pregame expectations
Expected wins adds up Louisiana's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2021
Every game starts at Louisiana's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard+3.06
- Possession & field position−0.03
- Clock+0.05
- Timeouts+0.04
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff−1.54
Game by game
- TEXL 18-38 at TEX26% → 0%Before kickoff −24 · On the field −26: Scoreboard −28, Timeouts −1
- NICHW 27-24 vs NICH95% → 69%Before kickoff +45 · On the field −25: Scoreboard +4, Possession & field position −2
- OHIOW 49-14 vs OHIO87% → 100%Before kickoff +37 · On the field +13: Scoreboard +16
- GASOW 28-20 at GASO85% → 18%Before kickoff +35 · On the field −67: Scoreboard −16, Possession & field position −4
- USAW 20-18 at USA79% → 59%Before kickoff +29 · On the field −20: Scoreboard +17
- APPW 41-13 vs APP38% → 100%Before kickoff −12 · On the field +62: Scoreboard +55, Timeouts −1
- ARSTW 28-27 at ARST88% → 95%Before kickoff +38 · On the field +7: Scoreboard +23, Clock +1
- TXSTW 45-0 vs TXST92% → 100%Before kickoff +42 · On the field +8: Scoreboard +11
- GASTW 21-17 vs GAST80% → 96%Before kickoff +30 · On the field +17: Scoreboard +22, Timeouts +1
- TROYW 35-21 at TROY68% → 97%Before kickoff +18 · On the field +29: Scoreboard +42, Clock +1
- LIBW 42-14 at LIB35% → 100%Before kickoff −15 · On the field +65: Scoreboard +61, Clock +2
- ULMW 21-16 vs ULM91% → 95%Before kickoff +41 · On the field +4: Scoreboard +15, Timeouts +1
- APPW 24-16 vs APP42% → 98%Before kickoff −8 · On the field +55: Scoreboard +41, Timeouts +2
- MRSHW 36-21 at MRSH62% → 99%Before kickoff +12 · On the field +37: Scoreboard +43, Clock +2
Points of win probability, from Louisiana's side.
Closest call
MRSH 51-54 UL (2025) - Louisiana dropped to a 4.5% win probability before pulling it out.
Season arc, 2021
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Louisiana's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2021
The largest single-play change in Louisiana's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Louisiana's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Louisiana's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Louisiana's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Louisiana's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.