Kent State
- SP+
- −6.4 (#93)
- FPI
- −9.0 (#100)
- SRS
- −13.5 (#111)
- Resume
- #73
Next game
Advanced stats
CollegeFootballData's play-by-play measures of how efficient and explosive a team was, placed against every other FBS team. How it works →
Profile vs. FBS, 2021
Farther out is better on every spoke. Dashed ring: the FBS median.
- EPA per playExpected points added on an average snap: how much each play moved the scoring odds.
- Success rateShare of snaps that stayed on schedule: half the yards needed on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of them on 3rd or 4th.
- ExplosivenessAverage EPA on the successful snaps: how big the good plays were.
- Rushing EPAEPA per designed run.
- Passing EPAEPA per pass play.
- Standard downsSuccess rate on downs where either a run or a pass makes sense, like 1st and 10 or 3rd and 2.
- Passing downsSuccess rate on downs that all but force a pass, like 2nd and 8 or longer, or 3rd and 5 or longer.
- Line yardsRushing yards per carry credited to the offensive line, weighting the first few yards most.
- Stuff rateShare of runs stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage.
- HavocShare of snaps with a tackle for loss, sack, forced fumble, interception or pass breakup.
Percentiles among the 130 FBS teams this season, where higher is better for the offense and the defense alike (a defense's numbers are what it allowed). The line in each bar is the FBS median. Garbage time excluded. Source: CollegeFootballData.
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2021
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Kent State allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season. Ranks are among FBS teams.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Kent State.
Players
YardLine's player model credits every play's value to the players involved, so each one's season can be measured in wins above a typical backup. How it works →
Players, 2021
Quarterback is the most valuable starting slot by a wide margin: the gap between a top-decile and a median FBS quarterback is about twice the gap at any other position.
- Dustin CrumQB427 plays · +0.311 pts/play · 12th of 219 QBs2.49WAR1.63 to 3.34
- Marquez CooperRB194 plays · +0.200 pts/play · 32nd of 387 RBs0.73WAR0.53 to 0.91
- Xavier WilliamsRB83 plays · +0.210 pts/play · 137th of 387 RBs0.33WAR0.24 to 0.43
- Dante CephasWR86 plays · +0.137 pts/play · 47th of 474 WRs0.22WAR0.12 to 0.32
- Keshunn AbramWR53 plays · +0.198 pts/play · 68th of 474 WRs0.20WAR0.14 to 0.25
- Nykeim JohnsonWR67 plays · +0.139 pts/play · 94th of 474 WRs0.17WAR0.10 to 0.25
- Ja'Shaun PokeWR35 plays · +0.151 pts/play · 242nd of 474 WRs0.10WAR0.06 to 0.13
- Andrew GlassPK20 plays · +0.227 pts/play · 46th of 128 kickers0.09WAR0.02 to 0.15
Every player (11)
- Bryan BradfordRB19 plays · +0.182 pts/play · 309th of 387 RBs0.06WAR0.04 to 0.09
- Aaron HackettTE5 plays · −0.015 pts/play · 41st of 234 TEs0.00WAR−0.01 to 0.01
- Josh SmithP38 plays · −0.005 pts/play · 98th of 101 punters0.00WAR−0.05 to 0.05
By position group, against FBS
Linemen and defenders are valued as units, in points per game against the median FBS unit, because play-by-play doesn't say who was on the field. Players are valued against a replacement-level backup, so the two aren't added together.
Wins above replacement credits each play's expected points to the players involved, adjusted for the opponent, and compares Kent State's players with a typical backup; 53 points make a win. Only snaps while the game was in doubt count, so a starter on a team that blows opponents out plays fewer of them: read value per play beside WAR. The line under each player (or the range on a phone) is the 90% interval. Ranks are among FBS teams and players. How this works
Transfer portal, 2021
7 players transferred in and 14 out. WAR is each one's 2020 season, before the move. Every team's portal
In 2021, the arrivals have added 0.17 WAR at Kent State and the departures 0.07 wherever they went.
The other 5
- Antwaine RichardsonS · 3★from Maryland--
- Damir FaisonEDGE · 3★from East Carolina--
- Nico BoldenS · 3★from New Mexico--
- Taj MustaphaWR · 3★from Wisconsin--
- Asher FrowEDGEfrom North Texas--
- Matthew TrickettK · 2★to Minnesota0.010.07
The other 13
- Antwan DixonWR · 3★to Valdosta State--
- Brad KemayouCB · 3★to undecided--
- Julian SamsIOL · 3★to undecided--
- Lonkevious McFaddenWR · 3★to Eastern Kentucky--
- Mike McNicholasIOL · 3★to undecided--
- Prince OkituamaDL · 3★to undecided--
- Woody BarrettQB · 3★to undecided--
- Jaylen DeCoteauCB · 2★to Sacred Heart--
- Jeremiah SalaamCB · 2★to undecided--
- Logan SwartzOT · 2★to undecided--
- Miles DanielCB · 2★to undecided--
- Oly OkombiDL · 2★to Towson--
- Quentin JonesDL · 2★to undecided--
Only quarterbacks, skill players and specialists have a WAR of their own, so they make up these totals; linemen and defenders count in the moves but add none. 2020 is the player's season at his old school, 2021 his season after the move. A dash means no FBS snaps that season. Rosters tie CFBD's portal entries to players, which works for about 19 in 20 skill-position moves.
Talent and roster
How much talent the roster had, by recruiting ratings, and how much of it showed up on the field, against every other FBS team. How it works →
What it had and what it did, 2021
- Roster talent: 358, 113th of 130 in FBSRoster talent247Sports' talent composite: the recruiting ratings of every player on the roster, transfers included.
- Recruiting: 132, 106th of 130 in FBSRecruitingAverage 247Sports class score over this season's class and the three before it.
- Returning production: 90%, 27th of 128 in FBSReturning productionShare of last season's production (expected points added) by players still on the roster.
- SP+ rating: −6.4, 93rd of 130 in FBSSP+ ratingThe result: Bill Connelly's opponent-adjusted rating, points per game better than an average FBS team.
Ranks and bars among the 130 FBS teams with a talent rating this season, best first; the line in each bar is the FBS median.
Talent conversion
Kent State's SP+ of −6.4 is 2.0 points above the −8.4 its roster talent predicts, 59th of 130 in FBS.
The same comparison on each side of the ball, positive is better for both.
Conversion by season
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2021
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Kent State's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 8 clear-cut ones account for 0.16 of the 0.23 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right. Ranks are among FBS teams; 1st gave up the least.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- vs BUFQ4 0:31 4th & 6 at KENT 31, down 3Punted; the numbers favored going for it−3.1 pts
- at CMUQ3 13:03 4th & 1 at KENT 30, down 9Punted; the numbers favored going for it−2.5 pts
- at OHIOQ4 13:00 4th & 2 at OHIO 37, up 14Punted; the numbers favored going for it−2.4 pts
- at WMUQ2 0:01 4th & 3 at WMU 3, down 9Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it−2.3 pts
- at NIUQ2 4:59 4th & 13 at NIU 32, down 17Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal−1.7 pts
- vs M-OHQ2 0:00 4th & 4 at M-OH 4, down 2Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it−1.6 pts
- at OHIOQ4 3:04 4th & 2 at OHIO 10, up 7Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it−1.2 pts
- at WYOQ4 13:01 4th & 2 at WYO 12, down 11Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it−1.0 pts
Every call this season (108)
- Q1 5:234th & 11 at TA&M 13, down 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 2:494th & 3 at TA&M 47, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 10:244th & 9 at KENT 42, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 3:204th & 11 at TA&M 47, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 14:044th & 10 at KENT 21, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 6:144th & 6 at KENT 40, down 17 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 1:524th & 3 at KENT 40, down 24 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 14:434th & 15 at KENT 28, down 24 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 4:254th & 1 at KENT 34, down 31 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 3:184th & 8 at TA&M 8, down 31 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q1 6:584th & 1 at KENT 40, up 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 6:584th & 2 at VMI 42, up 14 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 14:204th & 3 at VMI 3, up 22 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q2 5:344th & 1 at VMI 44, up 32 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 11:514th & 1 at KENT 48, up 36 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 8:424th & 4 at VMI 49, up 50 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 10:224th & 2 at KENT 33, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q2 13:384th & 20 at KENT 27, down 2 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 8:574th & 16 at IOWA 34, down 2 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 13:054th & 8 at IOWA 35, down 9 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 8:254th & 1 at IOWA 44, down 9 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 14:124th & 13 at KENT 13, down 16 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 9:134th & 19 at KENT 40, down 16 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 5:374th & 16 at KENT 30, down 16 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 2:184th & 4 at KENT 31, down 23 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 9:124th & 6 at KENT 31, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 6:394th & 2 at MD 18, tied · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q1 3:524th & 9 at MD 15, down 4 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 13:224th & 3 at MD 48, down 8 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 4:514th & 6 at MD 18, down 15 · Went for itClose call
- Q2 4:464th & 8 at MD 20, down 15 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 14:554th & 1 at MD 49, down 15 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 11:364th & 3 at MD 40, down 15 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 8:004th & 17 at KENT 35, down 21 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 14:484th & 11 at MD 16, down 28 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 4:524th & 12 at MD 34, down 21 · Went for itClose call
- Q1 1:154th & 9 at BGSU 16, up 4 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 8:334th & 10 at BGSU 16, up 4 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 3:044th & 10 at KENT 47, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:004th & 7 at BGSU 16, up 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 11:084th & 20 at KENT 33, up 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 4:244th & 15 at BGSU 39, up 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 13:514th & 3 at KENT 25, up 10 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 1:364th & 1 at KENT 32, up 10 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 6:024th & 11 at KENT 36, up 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 2:194th & 1 at BUF 44, up 18 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 0:004th & 5 at BUF 9, up 18 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 12:334th & 9 at KENT 41, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 8:374th & 24 at BUF 29, up 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 2:214th & 4 at BUF 25, up 10 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q4 3:384th & 11 at KENT 40, down 3 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 0:314th & 6 at KENT 31, down 3 · Punted−3.1 pts
- Q1 3:244th & 27 at KENT 34, down 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 2:134th & 18 at KENT 15, down 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 10:454th & 2 at WMU 45, down 13 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 3:474th & 9 at WMU 34, down 9 · Went for itClose call
- Q2 0:014th & 3 at WMU 3, down 9 · Kicked a field goal−2.3 pts
- Q3 10:404th & 12 at KENT 24, down 13 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 7:334th & 27 at KENT 10, down 19 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 4:554th & 9 at KENT 31, down 26 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 13:274th & 6 at WMU 46, down 34 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 9:004th & 1 at WMU 15, down 34 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 2:464th & 3 at KENT 36, down 33 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 6:274th & 2 at KENT 10, up 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 4:004th & 6 at OHIO 14, up 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q1 1:024th & 1 at OHIO 45, up 10 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 10:454th & 2 at KENT 33, up 10 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 6:534th & 11 at KENT 19, up 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 13:004th & 2 at OHIO 37, up 14 · Punted−2.4 pts
- Q4 3:044th & 2 at OHIO 10, up 7 · Kicked a field goal−1.2 pts
- Q1 12:294th & 12 at NIU 48, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 9:474th & 3 at NIU 42, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 14:104th & 4 at KENT 47, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 10:014th & 16 at NIU 22, down 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 0:514th & 1 at NIU 17, up 3 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 7:024th & 5 at NIU 43, up 11 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 10:354th & 8 at KENT 44, up 12 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 7:204th & 10 at CMU 15, up 7 · Went for itClose call
- Q1 3:244th & 10 at KENT 45, up 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 1:164th & 22 at KENT 23, down 5 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:004th & 8 at CMU 15, down 12 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 13:034th & 1 at KENT 30, down 9 · Punted−2.5 pts
- Q4 7:484th & 1 at CMU 44, down 17 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 2:254th & 19 at KENT 37, down 24 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 2:214th & 1 at AKR 17, up 22 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 8:224th & 17 at AKR 31, up 29 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 5:134th & 3 at AKR 3, up 29 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q3 1:174th & 1 at AKR 36, up 32 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 12:014th & 4 at AKR 14, up 32 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q4 5:474th & 2 at AKR 18, up 35 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 5:284th & 12 at AKR 28, up 35 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 12:384th & 5 at M-OH 45, down 6 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 0:004th & 4 at M-OH 4, down 2 · Kicked a field goal−1.6 pts
- Q3 7:024th & 13 at KENT 46, up 8 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 14:074th & 3 at M-OH 20, up 8 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q4 12:184th & 9 at M-OH 19, up 11 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 4:374th & 1 at M-OH 15, up 3 · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 11:254th & 6 at WYO 33, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 7:294th & 3 at WYO 23, up 10 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q2 4:044th & 3 at WYO 21, up 3 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 7:164th & 13 at midfield, down 4 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 13:014th & 2 at WYO 12, down 11 · Kicked a field goal−1.0 pts
- Q4 4:034th & 4 at WYO 38, down 14 · Went for itAgreed
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Costliest tries against the numbers
- at CMUQ3 0:35 Touchdown, down 10 before the tryWent for two; the numbers favored kicking (close call)−0.1 pts
- at WYOQ4 2:54 Touchdown, down 15 before the tryKicked; the numbers favored going for two (close call)−0.1 pts
- at AKRQ2 10:44 Touchdown, up 20 before the tryWent for two; the numbers favored kicking (close call)<0.1 pts
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2021
63rd of 130 FBS teams at beating the model's pregame expectations
Expected wins adds up Kent State's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2021
Every game starts at Kent State's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard−1.47
- Possession & field position+0.01
- Clock+0.12
- Timeouts−0.17
- Other+0.02
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff−0.26
Game by game
- TA&ML 10-41 at TA&M3% → 0%Before kickoff −47 · On the field −3: Scoreboard −6
- VMIW 60-10 vs VMI90% → 100%Before kickoff +40 · On the field +10: Scoreboard +12
- IOWAL 7-30 at IOWA8% → 0%Before kickoff −42 · On the field −7: Scoreboard −12
- MDL 16-37 at MD17% → 0%Before kickoff −33 · On the field −16: Scoreboard −21
- BGSUW 27-20 vs BGSU88% → 98%Before kickoff +38 · On the field +10: Scoreboard +17, Timeouts +1
- BUFW 48-38 vs BUF71% → 6%Before kickoff +21 · On the field −65: Scoreboard −55, Clock −3
- WMUL 31-64 at WMU31% → 0%Before kickoff −19 · On the field −31: Scoreboard −32
- OHIOW 34-27 at OHIO63% → 89%Before kickoff +13 · On the field +26: Scoreboard +36, Timeouts +7
- NIUW 52-47 vs NIU63% → 95%Before kickoff +13 · On the field +33: Scoreboard +27, Timeouts +3
- CMUL 30-54 at CMU43% → 0%Before kickoff −7 · On the field −42: Scoreboard −40, Timeouts −1
- AKRW 38-0 at AKR83% → 100%Before kickoff +33 · On the field +17: Scoreboard +23
- M-OHW 48-47 vs M-OH44% → 41%Before kickoff −6 · On the field −3: Timeouts −25, Clock +15
- NIUL 23-41 at NIU63% → 1%Before kickoff +13 · On the field −62: Scoreboard −51, Possession & field position +2
- WYOL 38-52 at WYO41% → 1%Before kickoff −9 · On the field −40: Scoreboard −37, Timeouts −2
Points of win probability, from Kent State's side.
Closest call
KENT 27-24 CMU (2016) - Kent State dropped to a 0.3% win probability before pulling it out.
Season arc, 2021
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Kent State's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2021
The largest single-play change in Kent State's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Kent State's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Kent State's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Kent State's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Kent State's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.