Try the model

Eastern Kentucky

Colonels · UAC · FCS
0-32020 · vs FBS opponents

Expected points

YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →

Drives vs. expectation, 2020
Per drive

Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.

Offense−0.74
Defense+2.38allowed
Adjusted for opponents

Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.

Offense−0.52
Defense+1.97allowed
Finishing

Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.

Offense−1.272.8 pts/trip
Defense+2.105.8 pts/trip allowed
Field position

Average expected points where drives started.

Offense0.99
Defense1.08opponents

Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Eastern Kentucky allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.

Game by game
Offense: points over expected per drive
Defense: points kept off the board per drive

Bars above the line: better than expected for Eastern Kentucky.

Fourth downs

YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →

Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2020
Made the numbers' call

Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.

17 of 2959%
Win probability given up

Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.

1.3 ptsper game
0.04 expected wins over 3 games
When going was clearly right

Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.

2 of 2100%

Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Eastern Kentucky's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 1 clear-cut ones account for 0.01 of the 0.04 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.

Costliest calls against the numbers
  1. at TROYQ2 0:03 4th & 28 at EKU 47, down 4Went for it; the numbers favored punting−1.2 pts
  2. at TROYQ3 9:35 4th & 2 at TROY 41, down 11Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.8 pts
  3. at TROYQ4 12:57 4th & 5 at TROY 45, down 8Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.5 pts
  4. at TROYQ4 14:41 4th & 3 at TROY 4, down 11Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.5 pts
  5. at MRSHQ2 7:44 4th & 2 at EKU 29, down 28Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.3 pts
  6. at TROYQ2 13:37 4th & 2 at TROY 2, down 7Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.3 pts
  7. at WVUQ1 13:22 4th & 1 at EKU 35, down 7Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.1 pts
  8. at MRSHQ3 12:09 4th & 3 at MRSH 44, down 38Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.1 pts
Every call this season (29)
Wk 1 · at MRSH · L 0-594 of 9 agreed
  1. Q1 9:354th & 23 at EKU 9, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
  2. Q1 4:064th & 6 at MRSH 33, down 14 · Went for itAgreed
  3. Q2 7:444th & 2 at EKU 29, down 28 · PuntedClose call
  4. Q2 3:134th & 1 at EKU 44, down 31 · Went for itAgreed
  5. Q2 1:414th & 5 at EKU 24, down 38 · PuntedAgreed
  6. Q3 12:094th & 3 at MRSH 44, down 38 · PuntedClose call
  7. Q3 3:304th & 8 at MRSH 37, down 45 · Kicked a field goalClose call
  8. Q4 12:244th & 3 at EKU 42, down 52 · PuntedClose call
  9. Q4 2:164th & 1 at EKU 34, down 59 · PuntedClose call
Wk 2 · at WVU · L 10-568 of 9 agreed
  1. Q1 13:224th & 1 at EKU 35, down 7 · PuntedClose call
  2. Q1 6:084th & 6 at EKU 17, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
  3. Q2 15:004th & 16 at EKU 13, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
  4. Q2 8:164th & 13 at EKU 25, down 21 · PuntedAgreed
  5. Q2 2:294th & 5 at EKU 20, down 28 · PuntedAgreed
  6. Q3 12:164th & 12 at WVU 15, down 35 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
  7. Q3 8:074th & 18 at EKU 17, down 39 · PuntedAgreed
  8. Q4 15:004th & 15 at EKU 15, down 39 · PuntedAgreed
  9. Q4 11:274th & 13 at EKU 47, down 39 · PuntedAgreed
Wk 7 · at TROY · L 29-315 of 11 agreed
  1. Q1 12:534th & 16 at EKU 15, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
  2. Q1 2:354th & 6 at midfield, down 7 · PuntedClose call
  3. Q2 13:374th & 2 at TROY 2, down 7 · Kicked a field goalClose call
  4. Q2 0:034th & 28 at EKU 47, down 4 · Went for it−1.2 pts
  5. Q3 9:354th & 2 at TROY 41, down 11 · PuntedClose call
  6. Q3 3:064th & 1 at TROY 37, down 11 · Went for itAgreed
  7. Q4 14:414th & 3 at TROY 4, down 11 · Kicked a field goalClose call
  8. Q4 12:574th & 5 at TROY 45, down 8 · PuntedClose call
  9. Q4 9:354th & 13 at EKU 17, down 8 · PuntedAgreed
  10. Q4 5:504th & 3 at TROY 8, down 8 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
  11. Q4 1:184th & 9 at EKU 33, down 5 · Went for itAgreed
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Made the numbers' call

Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.

3 of 475%
Win probability given up

Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.

0.1 ptsthis season
When two was clearly right

Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.

-
Went for two 1 time, converted 0
Costliest tries against the numbers
  1. at TROYQ4 0:21 Touchdown, up 1 before the tryWent for two; the numbers favored kicking (close call)−0.1 pts

Win probability

YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →

Record vs. expectation, 2020
0-3vs. 0.1 expected−0.1 wins

Expected wins adds up Eastern Kentucky's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.

  1. L
    MRSH
  2. L
    WVU
  3. L
    TROY
What moved it, 2020
−1.4 wins
before kickoff: being favored, vs. coin flips
0.0 wins
on the field, after the opening snap

Every game starts at Eastern Kentucky's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →

  • Scoreboard−0.17
  • Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.13
Game by game

Points of win probability, from Eastern Kentucky's side.

Closest call

EKU 59-57 BGSU (2022) - Eastern Kentucky dropped to a 7.3% win probability before pulling it out.

Season arc, 2020

Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Eastern Kentucky's own win-probability curve.

Biggest swings of 2020

The largest single-play change in Eastern Kentucky's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.

Stolen wins

Eastern Kentucky's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.

Let it slip

Eastern Kentucky's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.

Stock & rivalries

Stock

Eastern Kentucky's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.

View full history ›
$75.81
Series & rivalries

Eastern Kentucky's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.

YardLine · model v10Model estimate - not betting advice · Data provided by CollegeFootballData.com