Nicholls
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2016
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Nicholls allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Nicholls.
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2016
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Nicholls's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 2 clear-cut ones account for 0.04 of the 0.05 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- at USAQ4 2:58 4th & 4 at USA 33, up 7Punted; the numbers favored going for it−2.4 pts
- at USAQ3 12:17 4th & 3 at USA 3, down 1Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it−1.3 pts
- at USAQ2 4:02 4th & 4 at NICH 47, down 1Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.4 pts
- at USAQ2 8:06 4th & 4 at USA 20, up 7Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.2 pts
- at UGAQ4 14:52 4th & 4 at UGA 48, down 12Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.2 pts
- at UGAQ2 2:58 4th & 1 at NICH 44, down 10Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.2 pts
- at USAQ1 9:05 4th & 1 at NICH 39, down 7Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.1 pts
- at UGAQ1 0:20 4th & 9 at UGA 37, down 7Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)<0.1 pts
Every call this season (18)
- Q1 8:304th & 4 at NICH 11, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 0:204th & 9 at UGA 37, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 2:584th & 1 at NICH 44, down 10 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 13:164th & 6 at NICH 22, down 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 7:484th & 1 at UGA 38, down 6 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 14:524th & 4 at UGA 48, down 12 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 7:504th & 8 at UGA 8, down 12 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 4:184th & 9 at NICH 35, down 9 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 14:484th & 5 at USA 47, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 9:054th & 1 at NICH 39, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 4:574th & 26 at NICH 18, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 8:064th & 4 at USA 20, up 7 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q2 4:024th & 4 at NICH 47, down 1 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 12:174th & 3 at USA 3, down 1 · Kicked a field goal−1.3 pts
- Q3 6:424th & 17 at NICH 18, down 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 3:564th & 6 at NICH 30, down 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 13:334th & 8 at NICH 22, down 1 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 2:584th & 4 at USA 33, up 7 · Punted−2.4 pts
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Costliest tries against the numbers
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2016
Expected wins adds up Nicholls's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2016
Every game starts at Nicholls's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard−0.11
- Possession & field position+0.02
- Clock−0.12
- Timeouts+0.14
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.36
Game by game
- UGAL 24-26 at UGA0% → 7%Before kickoff −50 · On the field +6: Scoreboard −4
- USAL 40-41 at USA11% → 34%Before kickoff −39 · On the field +23: Timeouts +14, Clock −12
Points of win probability, from Nicholls's side.
Closest call
NICH 26-23 KU (2018) - Nicholls dropped to a 19.9% win probability before pulling it out.
Season arc, 2016
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Nicholls's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2016
The largest single-play change in Nicholls's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Nicholls's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Nicholls's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Nicholls's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Nicholls's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.