Try the model

Alabama State

Hornets · SWAC · FCS
0-12016 · vs FBS opponents

Expected points

YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →

Drives vs. expectation, 2016
Per drive

Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.

Offense−0.28
Defense+0.19allowed
Adjusted for opponents

Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.

Offense−0.73
Defense+0.78allowed
Finishing

Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.

Offense+3.447.0 pts/trip
Defense−0.673.0 pts/trip allowed
Field position

Average expected points where drives started.

Offense0.54
Defense1.96opponents

Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Alabama State allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.

Game by game
Offense: points over expected per drive
Defense: points kept off the board per drive

Bars above the line: better than expected for Alabama State.

Fourth downs

YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →

Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2016
Made the numbers' call

Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.

9 of 1182%
Win probability given up

Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.

0.4 ptsper game
0.00 expected wins over 1 game
When going was clearly right

Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.

-

Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Alabama State's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 0 clear-cut ones account for 0.00 of the 0.00 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.

Costliest calls against the numbers
  1. at UTSAQ4 5:20 4th & 2 at ALST 34, down 19Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.3 pts
  2. at UTSAQ4 2:35 4th & 9 at UTSA 36, down 19Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.1 pts
Every call this season (11)
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Made the numbers' call

Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.

2 of 2100%
Win probability given up

Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.

0 ptsthis season
When two was clearly right

Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.

-
Went for two 1 time, converted 0

Win probability

YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →

Record vs. expectation, 2016
0-1vs. 0.0 expectedon par

Expected wins adds up Alabama State's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.

  1. L
    UTSA
What moved it, 2016
−0.5 wins
before kickoff: being favored, vs. coin flips
0.0 wins
on the field, after the opening snap

Every game starts at Alabama State's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →

  • Scoreboard−0.08
  • Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.08
Game by game

Points of win probability, from Alabama State's side.

Season arc, 2016

Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Alabama State's own win-probability curve.

Biggest swings of 2016

The largest single-play change in Alabama State's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.

Stolen wins

Alabama State's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.

No games rated yet.
Let it slip

Alabama State's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.

Stock & rivalries

Stock

Alabama State's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.

View full history ›
$80.57
Series & rivalries

Alabama State's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.

YardLine · model v10Model estimate - not betting advice · Data provided by CollegeFootballData.com