Try the model

Sam Houston

Bearkats · Conference USA · FBS
0-12019 · vs FBS opponents

Next game

NMSU
vs New Mexico State
Wed, Oct 21 · 8:00 PM EDT
Projected score
SHSU24
NMSU25
Win chance
53%
SHSU 53%NMSU 47%
Points model v7, built without betting lines. A model's view, not betting advice.Full projection →

Expected points

YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →

Drives vs. expectation, 2019
Per drive

Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.

Offense+0.09
Defense+0.75allowed
Adjusted for opponents

Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.

Offense−0.16
Defense+0.52allowed
Finishing

Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.

Offense−0.014.0 pts/trip
Defense+0.244.7 pts/trip allowed
Field position

Average expected points where drives started.

Offense0.52
Defense1.24opponents

Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Sam Houston allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.

Game by game
Offense: points over expected per drive
Defense: points kept off the board per drive

Bars above the line: better than expected for Sam Houston.

Players

YardLine's player model credits every play's value to the players involved, so each one's season can be measured in wins above a typical backup. How it works →

Players, 2019
The quarterback
Ty Brock: 0.12 WAR (90% interval 0.07 to 0.17)

Quarterback is the most valuable starting slot by a wide margin: the gap between a top-decile and a median FBS quarterback is about twice the gap at any other position.

  1. Ty BrockQB38 plays · +0.167 pts/play0.12WAR0.07 to 0.17
  2. Eric SchmidQB26 plays · +0.188 pts/play0.09WAR0.06 to 0.12
By position group
Quarterback
0.21WAR
Running backs
0.00WAR
Receivers
0.00WAR
Tight ends
0.00WAR
Kicker
0.00WAR
Punter
0.00WAR
Line and defense, points per game vs the median FBS unit
Offensive line
−0.19/game
Front seven
+0.07/game
Secondary
−0.17/game

Linemen and defenders are valued as units, in points per game against the median FBS unit, because play-by-play doesn't say who was on the field. Players are valued against a replacement-level backup, so the two aren't added together.

Wins above replacement credits each play's expected points to the players involved, adjusted for the opponent, and compares Sam Houston's players with a typical backup; 53 points make a win. Only snaps while the game was in doubt count, so a starter on a team that blows opponents out plays fewer of them: read value per play beside WAR. The line under each player (or the range on a phone) is the 90% interval. How this works

Fourth downs

YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →

Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2019
Made the numbers' call

Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.

9 of 1464%
Win probability given up

Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.

1.2 ptsper game
0.01 expected wins over 1 game
When going was clearly right

Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.

-

Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Sam Houston's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 0 clear-cut ones account for 0.00 of the 0.01 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.

Costliest calls against the numbers
  1. at UNMQ4 1:22 4th & 15 at UNM 27, down 8Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.7 pts
  2. at UNMQ3 5:12 4th & 8 at UNM 32, down 2Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.3 pts
  3. at UNMQ1 13:20 4th & 1 at SHSU 41, tiedPunted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.1 pts
  4. at UNMQ4 13:41 4th & 2 at SHSU 33, down 16Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.1 pts
  5. at UNMQ4 10:19 4th & 7 at UNM 48, down 16Went for it; the numbers favored punting (close call)<0.1 pts
Every call this season (14)
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Made the numbers' call

Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.

3 of 475%
Win probability given up

Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.

0.8 ptsthis season
When two was clearly right

Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.

-
Went for two 1 time, converted 1
Costliest tries against the numbers
  1. at UNMQ4 3:01 Touchdown, down 10 before the tryWent for two; the numbers favored kicking (close call)−0.8 pts

Win probability

YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →

Record vs. expectation, 2019
0-1vs. 0.3 expected−0.3 wins

Expected wins adds up Sam Houston's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.

  1. L
    UNM
What moved it, 2019
−0.2 wins
before kickoff: being favored, vs. coin flips
−0.3 wins
on the field, after the opening snap

Every game starts at Sam Houston's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →

  • Scoreboard−0.29
  • Possession & field position+0.01
  • Timeouts−0.02
  • Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.04
Game by game

Points of win probability, from Sam Houston's side.

Closest call

SHSU 21-17 ORST (2025) - Sam Houston dropped to a 4.9% win probability before pulling it out.

Season arc, 2019

Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Sam Houston's own win-probability curve.

Biggest swings of 2019

The largest single-play change in Sam Houston's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.

Stolen wins

Sam Houston's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.

Let it slip

Sam Houston's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.

Stock & rivalries

Stock

Sam Houston's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.

View full history ›
$79.26-0.9% over the past year
Series & rivalries

Sam Houston's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.

YardLine · model v10Model estimate - not betting advice · Data provided by CollegeFootballData.com