Prairie View A&M
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2016
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Prairie View A&M allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Prairie View A&M.
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2016
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Prairie View A&M's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and every call that differed was a close one. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- at TA&MQ1 1:46 4th & 1 at PV 34, down 10Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)0.1 pts
- at TA&MQ2 2:53 4th & 3 at PV 27, down 24Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)<0.1 pts
- at TA&MQ4 10:10 4th & 3 at PV 41, down 58Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)<0.1 pts
Every call this season (19)
- AgreedQ1 15:004th & 15 at PV 20, tied, Punted
- AgreedQ1 7:344th & 9 at TA&M 21, down 3, Kicked a field goal
- AgreedQ1 5:554th & 10 at PV 26, down 3, Punted
- Close callQ1 1:464th & 1 at PV 34, down 10, Punted
- AgreedQ2 8:104th & 10 at TA&M 24, down 24, Kicked a field goal
- Close callQ2 2:534th & 3 at PV 27, down 24, Punted
- AgreedQ2 1:034th & 10 at PV 25, down 31, Punted
- AgreedQ3 11:114th & 10 at PV 25, down 45, Punted
- AgreedQ3 8:264th & 1 at PV 34, down 48, Went for it
- AgreedQ4 14:304th & 20 at PV 37, down 51, Punted
- AgreedQ4 14:304th & 8 at TA&M 48, down 58, Punted
- Close callQ4 10:104th & 3 at PV 41, down 58, Punted
- AgreedQ1 7:314th & 9 at PV 40, tied, Punted
- AgreedQ1 4:564th & 8 at PV 46, down 7, Punted
- AgreedQ2 9:074th & 4 at PV 31, down 28, Punted
- AgreedQ2 3:274th & 7 at RICE 39, down 35, Went for it
- AgreedQ3 12:494th & 2 at PV 38, down 24, Went for it
- AgreedQ3 5:264th & 10 at PV 45, down 28, Punted
- AgreedQ4 8:354th & 2 at RICE 2, down 35, Went for it
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Costliest tries against the numbers
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2016
Expected wins adds up Prairie View A&M's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2016
Every game starts at Prairie View A&M's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard−0.12
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.05
Game by game
- TA&ML 0-67 at TA&M0% → 0%Before kickoff −50 · On the field 0: Scoreboard −1
- RICEL 44-65 at RICE7% → 0%Before kickoff −43 · On the field −7: Scoreboard −11
Points of win probability, from Prairie View A&M's side.
Season arc, 2016
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Prairie View A&M's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2016
The largest single-play change in Prairie View A&M's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Prairie View A&M's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Prairie View A&M's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Prairie View A&M's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Prairie View A&M's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.