UT Martin
- SRS
- −20.9 (#164)
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2022
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what UT Martin allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for UT Martin.
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2022
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than UT Martin's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 0 clear-cut ones account for 0.00 of the 0.00 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.
Costliest calls against the numbers
Every call this season (24)
- Q1 13:384th & 5 at UTM 30, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 9:364th & 16 at UTM 30, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 6:074th & 16 at UTM 30, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 4:254th & 12 at BOIS 37, down 7 · Went for itClose call
- Q2 9:284th & 13 at BOIS 48, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 5:184th & 4 at UTM 31, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 3:294th & 4 at UTM 31, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 10:394th & 17 at UTM 9, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 9:044th & 3 at UTM 23, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 5:474th & 3 at UTM 23, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 14:154th & 8 at UTM 22, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 6:164th & 15 at UTM 32, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 4:304th & 15 at UTM 32, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 2:154th & 8 at UTM 22, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 1:124th & 8 at UTM 22, up 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 13:554th & 3 at UTM 32, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 12:474th & 12 at UTM 23, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 8:034th & 13 at UTM 22, down 24 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 6:024th & 6 at UTM 29, down 31 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 2:354th & 2 at TENN 47, down 38 · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 0:234th & 1 at UTM 34, down 45 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 9:214th & 2 at TENN 23, down 51 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 9:354th & 13 at TENN 22, down 44 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q4 5:044th & 9 at TENN 13, down 44 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2022
Expected wins adds up UT Martin's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2022
Every game starts at UT Martin's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard+0.29
- Clock+0.02
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.45
Game by game
- BOISL 7-30 at BOIS5% → 80%Before kickoff −45 · On the field +76: Scoreboard +31, Clock +2
- TENNL 24-65 at TENN1% → 0%Before kickoff −49 · On the field −1: Scoreboard −2
Points of win probability, from UT Martin's side.
Closest call
UTM 24-13 KENN (2024) - UT Martin dropped to a 41.5% win probability before pulling it out.
Season arc, 2022
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is UT Martin's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2022
The largest single-play change in UT Martin's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
UT Martin's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
UT Martin's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
UT Martin's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
UT Martin's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.