Try the model

Missouri State

Bears · Conference USA · FBS
0-12017 · vs FBS opponents

Next game

DEL
at Delaware
Tue, Oct 20 · 7:00 PM EDT
Projected score
MOST23
DEL32
Win chance
32%
MOST 32%DEL 68%
Points model v7, built without betting lines. A model's view, not betting advice.Full projection →

Expected points

YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →

Drives vs. expectation, 2017
Per drive

Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.

Offense+0.92
Defense+2.45allowed
Adjusted for opponents

Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.

Offense+0.36
Defense+0.73allowed
Finishing

Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.

Offense+0.504.7 pts/trip
Defense+0.795.2 pts/trip allowed
Field position

Average expected points where drives started.

Offense0.80
Defense1.44opponents

Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Missouri State allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.

Game by game
Offense: points over expected per drive
Defense: points kept off the board per drive

Bars above the line: better than expected for Missouri State.

Players

YardLine's player model credits every play's value to the players involved, so each one's season can be measured in wins above a typical backup. How it works →

Players, 2017
The quarterback
Peyton Huslig: 0.00 WAR (90% interval 0.00 to 0.01)

Quarterback is the most valuable starting slot by a wide margin: the gap between a top-decile and a median FBS quarterback is about twice the gap at any other position.

  1. Peyton HusligQB2 plays · +0.113 pts/play0.00WAR0.00 to 0.01
By position group
Quarterback
0.00WAR
Running backs
0.00WAR
Receivers
0.00WAR
Tight ends
0.00WAR
Kicker
0.00WAR
Punter
0.00WAR
Line and defense, points per game vs the median FBS unit
Offensive line
+0.13/game
Front seven
-/game
Secondary
−0.02/game

Linemen and defenders are valued as units, in points per game against the median FBS unit, because play-by-play doesn't say who was on the field. Players are valued against a replacement-level backup, so the two aren't added together.

Wins above replacement credits each play's expected points to the players involved, adjusted for the opponent, and compares Missouri State's players with a typical backup; 53 points make a win. Only snaps while the game was in doubt count, so a starter on a team that blows opponents out plays fewer of them: read value per play beside WAR. The line under each player (or the range on a phone) is the 90% interval. How this works

Fourth downs

YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →

Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2017
Made the numbers' call

Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.

5 of 771%
Win probability given up

Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.

0.3 ptsper game
0.00 expected wins over 1 game
When going was clearly right

Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.

Nonecame up

Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Missouri State's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and every call that differed was a close one. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.

Costliest calls against the numbers
  1. at MIZQ2 15:00 4th & 1 at MOST 29, up 1Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)0.2 pts
  2. at MIZQ3 9:48 4th & 4 at MIZ 48, down 16Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)0.1 pts
Every call this season (7)
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Made the numbers' call

Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.

5 of 683%
Win probability given up

Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.

<0.1 ptsthis season
When two was clearly right

Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.

Nonecame up
Went for two 1 time, converted 1
Costliest tries against the numbers
  1. at MIZQ4 14:53 Touchdown, down 17 before the tryWent for two; the numbers favored kicking (close call)<0.1 pts

Win probability

YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →

Record vs. expectation, 2017
0-1vs. 0.0 expectedon par

Expected wins adds up Missouri State's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.

  1. L
    MIZ
What moved it, 2017
−0.5 wins
before kickoff: being favored, vs. coin flips
0.0 wins
on the field, after the opening snap

Every game starts at Missouri State's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →

  • Scoreboard−0.03
  • Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.01
Game by game

Points of win probability, from Missouri State's side.

Closest call

MOST 22-20 MTSU (2025) - Missouri State dropped to a 4.4% win probability before pulling it out.

Season arc, 2017

Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Missouri State's own win-probability curve.

Biggest swings of 2017

The largest single-play change in Missouri State's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.

Stolen wins

Missouri State's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.

Let it slip

Missouri State's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.

Stock & rivalries

Stock

Missouri State's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.

View full history ›
$90.06-1.1% over the past year
Series & rivalries

Missouri State's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.

YardLine · model v10Model estimate - not betting advice · Data provided by CollegeFootballData.com