Grambling
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2019
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Grambling allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Grambling.
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2019
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Grambling's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 0 clear-cut ones account for 0.00 of the 0.01 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- at LTQ4 8:58 4th & 4 at LT 9, down 13Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.5 pts
- at ULMQ1 12:27 4th & 3 at ULM 23, tiedKicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)<0.1 pts
- at ULMQ3 11:59 4th & 6 at ULM 27, down 15Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)<0.1 pts
- at ULMQ4 5:38 4th & 4 at ULM 44, down 22Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)<0.1 pts
Every call this season (16)
- Q1 12:274th & 3 at ULM 23, tied · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q1 7:474th & 6 at GRAM 24, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 9:104th & 13 at ULM 43, down 8 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 0:074th & 10 at ULM 24, down 11 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 11:594th & 6 at ULM 27, down 15 · Went for itClose call
- Q3 2:114th & 29 at ULM 41, down 15 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 14:524th & 4 at ULM 4, down 22 · Went for itAgreed
- Q4 5:384th & 4 at ULM 44, down 22 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 15:004th & 1 at LT 5, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 7:534th & 7 at GRAM 48, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 1:284th & 6 at GRAM 20, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 6:424th & 9 at LT 31, down 10 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 4:384th & 21 at GRAM 9, down 17 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 1:434th & 11 at GRAM 36, down 20 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 8:584th & 4 at LT 9, down 13 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 3:234th & 5 at LT 47, down 6 · Went for itAgreed
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Costliest tries against the numbers
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2019
Expected wins adds up Grambling's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2019
Every game starts at Grambling's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard−0.15
- Timeouts−0.01
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.14
Game by game
- ULML 9-31 at ULM4% → 0%Before kickoff −46 · On the field −3: Scoreboard −7
- LTL 14-20 at LT2% → 5%Before kickoff −48 · On the field +2: Scoreboard −8
Points of win probability, from Grambling's side.
Season arc, 2019
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Grambling's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2019
The largest single-play change in Grambling's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Grambling's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Grambling's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Grambling's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Grambling's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.