Fordham
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2018
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Fordham allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Fordham.
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2018
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Fordham's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 2 clear-cut ones account for 0.03 of the 0.04 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- at CLTQ2 0:02 4th & 15 at FOR 31, down 6Went for it; the numbers favored punting−2.2 pts
- at CLTQ4 13:47 4th & 22 at CLT 38, down 17Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal−1.0 pts
- at CLTQ2 7:38 4th & 2 at CLT 46, down 6Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.8 pts
- at CLTQ4 9:39 4th & 9 at CLT 43, down 17Went for it; the numbers favored punting (close call)−0.1 pts
- at CLTQ4 4:34 4th & 10 at CLT 33, down 24Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)<0.1 pts
Every call this season (12)
- Q1 13:084th & 7 at CLT 32, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q1 8:084th & 10 at CLT 49, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 4:374th & 3 at FOR 32, down 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 10:484th & 6 at FOR 24, down 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 7:384th & 2 at CLT 46, down 6 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 0:024th & 15 at FOR 31, down 6 · Went for it−2.2 pts
- Q3 15:004th & 8 at FOR 46, down 6 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 12:504th & 6 at CLT 15, down 6 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 10:104th & 10 at FOR 45, down 10 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 13:474th & 22 at CLT 38, down 17 · Went for it−1.0 pts
- Q4 9:394th & 9 at CLT 43, down 17 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 4:344th & 10 at CLT 33, down 24 · Went for itClose call
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2018
Expected wins adds up Fordham's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2018
Every game starts at Fordham's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard−0.15
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.04
Game by game
Points of win probability, from Fordham's side.
Closest call
FOR 40-37 BUF (2023) - Fordham dropped to a 5.9% win probability before pulling it out.
Season arc, 2018
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Fordham's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2018
The largest single-play change in Fordham's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Fordham's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Fordham's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Fordham's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Fordham's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.