Colgate
- SRS
- −35.2 (#220)
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2022
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Colgate allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Colgate.
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2022
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Colgate's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 0 clear-cut ones account for 0.00 of the 0.01 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- at STANQ3 1:11 4th & 1 at COLG 34, down 18Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.4 pts
- at STANQ3 1:11 4th & 1 at COLG 34, down 18Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.4 pts
- at ARMYQ4 8:17 4th & 6 at ARMY 8, down 25Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.2 pts
- at ARMYQ4 0:53 4th & 6 at ARMY 23, down 25Went for it; the numbers favored a field goal (close call)−0.1 pts
- at ARMYQ1 11:04 4th & 4 at ARMY 32, tiedKicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.1 pts
- at STANQ1 8:51 4th & 3 at STAN 15, down 7Kicked a field goal; the numbers favored going for it (close call)<0.1 pts
Every call this season (20)
- Q1 8:514th & 3 at STAN 15, down 7 · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q1 5:264th & 5 at COLG 31, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 3:574th & 9 at STAN 27, down 7 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 10:514th & 14 at COLG 21, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 10:514th & 14 at COLG 21, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 5:304th & 7 at COLG 28, down 14 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 5:174th & 7 at STAN 7, down 21 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 1:114th & 1 at COLG 34, down 18 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 1:114th & 1 at COLG 34, down 18 · PuntedClose call
- Q4 12:034th & 11 at COLG 19, down 25 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 7:484th & 4 at COLG 26, down 25 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 1:054th & 8 at COLG 27, down 31 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 1:054th & 8 at COLG 27, down 31 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 11:044th & 4 at ARMY 32, tied · Kicked a field goalClose call
- Q1 0:174th & 15 at ARMY 35, down 4 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q2 8:304th & 5 at COLG 30, down 11 · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 2:544th & 1 at ARMY 24, down 18 · Went for itAgreed
- Q3 0:464th & 16 at ARMY 43, down 25 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 8:174th & 6 at ARMY 8, down 25 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 0:534th & 6 at ARMY 23, down 25 · Went for itClose call
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2022
Expected wins adds up Colgate's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2022
Every game starts at Colgate's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard−0.08
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.04
Game by game
- STANL 10-41 at STAN1% → 0%Before kickoff −49 · On the field −1: Scoreboard −2
- ARMYL 17-42 at ARMY3% → 0%Before kickoff −47 · On the field −3: Scoreboard −5
Points of win probability, from Colgate's side.
Season arc, 2022
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Colgate's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2022
The largest single-play change in Colgate's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Colgate's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Colgate's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Colgate's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Colgate's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.