Samford
Next game
Expected points
YardLine's expected-points model values every snap by what a drive from that spot is worth on average, so a drive can be judged against where it started. How it works →
Drives vs. expectation, 2014
Points over expected per drive, from where each drive started.
Per drive against an average FBS opponent, neutral field.
Points over expected per trip inside the opponent's 40.
Average expected points where drives started.
Every snap has an expected-points value: what a drive from that spot, down and distance is worth on average. A drive over expected beat its starting spot; defense counts what Samford allowed, so lower is better. The adjusted number fits every team against the opponents it actually played, so it leans toward average early in a season.
Game by game
Bars above the line: better than expected for Samford.
Fourth downs
YardLine's fourth-down model values going for it, kicking and punting on every real fourth down, so each call can be checked against the numbers. How it works →
Fourth-down calls vs. the numbers, 2014
Calls that matched the option with the best modeled win probability.
Summed over every call that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for it when going beat every other option by a point or more.
Each real fourth down is valued three ways (go for it, kick, punt) from the score, clock and field position before the snap, using league-wide odds rather than Samford's own. A call that differs gives up the gap to the best option; gaps under one point are close calls, and the 0 clear-cut ones account for 0.00 of the 0.00 expected wins. The model sees the situation, not the injury report, so a call it disagrees with can still be right.
Costliest calls against the numbers
- at TCUQ1 7:09 4th & 2 at TCU 41, down 14Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.1 pts
- at AUBQ1 12:55 4th & 2 at AUB 43, tiedPunted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.1 pts
- at TCUQ2 14:36 4th & 1 at SAM 34, down 21Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.1 pts
- at TCUQ1 13:00 4th & 1 at SAM 34, down 7Punted; the numbers favored going for it (close call)−0.1 pts
- at TCUQ4 10:50 4th & 8 at SAM 27, down 34Went for it; the numbers favored punting (close call)−0.1 pts
Every call this season (19)
- Q1 13:004th & 1 at SAM 34, down 7 · PuntedClose call
- Q1 9:474th & 27 at SAM 14, down 7 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 7:094th & 2 at TCU 41, down 14 · PuntedClose call
- Q2 14:364th & 1 at SAM 34, down 21 · PuntedClose call
- Q3 15:004th & 10 at TCU 48, down 17 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 10:484th & 13 at SAM 20, down 17 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 6:214th & 7 at SAM 9, down 27 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 3:044th & 10 at SAM 11, down 27 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 1:044th & 14 at SAM 46, down 27 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 10:504th & 8 at SAM 27, down 34 · Went for itClose call
- Q4 9:254th & 12 at SAM 23, down 41 · PuntedAgreed
- Q1 12:554th & 2 at AUB 43, tied · PuntedClose call
- Q1 7:164th & 1 at AUB 13, tied · Went for itAgreed
- Q2 14:484th & 15 at SAM 30, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 6:434th & 20 at SAM 15, tied · PuntedAgreed
- Q2 1:344th & 4 at SAM 34, down 3 · PuntedAgreed
- Q3 12:094th & 11 at AUB 17, down 10 · Kicked a field goalAgreed
- Q3 8:364th & 8 at SAM 27, down 17 · PuntedAgreed
- Q4 15:004th & 11 at SAM 30, down 17 · PuntedAgreed
After touchdowns: kick or go for two?
Tries that matched the option with the better modeled win probability.
Summed over every try that differed, in points of win probability.
Went for two when it beat kicking by a point or more.
Win probability
YardLine's model estimates each team's chance of winning before kickoff and again after every play, from the score, clock, down, distance and field position. How it works →
Record vs. expectation, 2014
Expected wins adds up Samford's chance of winning each game as the model saw it at kickoff - a 70% favorite counts 0.7.
What moved it, 2014
Every game starts at Samford's pregame chance; everything after that is the field. The model's own breakdown of each game's final play splits the on-field part by what drove it, and the parts add up exactly. How it works →
- Scoreboard−0.06
- Less the pregame edge, counted before kickoff+0.04
Game by game
- TCUL 14-48 at TCU2% → 0%Before kickoff −48 · On the field −2: Scoreboard −3
- AUBL 7-31 at AUB1% → 0%Before kickoff −49 · On the field 0: Scoreboard −3
Points of win probability, from Samford's side.
Season arc, 2014
Every completed game this season, in order - each tile is Samford's own win-probability curve.
Biggest swings of 2014
The largest single-play change in Samford's win probability this season - one snap that moved the outcome the most.
Stolen wins
Samford's own lowest win probability at any point in a game it went on to win, across the whole archive - the deepest holes it climbed out of.
Let it slip
Samford's own highest win probability at any point in a game it went on to lose, across the whole archive - the biggest leads it didn't hold.
Stock & rivalries
Stock
Samford's leaguewide Elo rating, tracked like a stock price - built from game results and margins, not the model's own win-probability predictions.
Series & rivalries
Samford's most-played opponents across the whole archive - open one for the full head-to-head history.